2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of land use and amenities on public transport use, urban planning and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(15 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature confirms that walking and public transportation ridership among older adults is positively correlated to mixed land-use, and supportive land-uses are more important A. Soltani et al Journal of Transport Geography 68 (2018) 109-117 than income in shifting people away from cars (Hu et al, 2016;Kim and Ulfarsson, 2004;Winters et al, 2015). Surprisingly, built environment features such as population density and road network design characteristics are not statistically significant in Shiraz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The literature confirms that walking and public transportation ridership among older adults is positively correlated to mixed land-use, and supportive land-uses are more important A. Soltani et al Journal of Transport Geography 68 (2018) 109-117 than income in shifting people away from cars (Hu et al, 2016;Kim and Ulfarsson, 2004;Winters et al, 2015). Surprisingly, built environment features such as population density and road network design characteristics are not statistically significant in Shiraz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Other methods have also been considered, such as multiplicative regression Zhao et al, 2014;Kepaptsoglou et al, 2017) [3,22,23], two-stage least square regression (2SLS) (Taylor et al, 2004;Estupiñán and Rodriguez, 2008) [24,25], Poisson regression [3,6], negative binomial regression [11], and structural equation modelling (SEM) (Sohn and Shim, 2010) [8]; geographical methods such as distance-decay weighted regression [1] and the network Kriging method (Zhang and Wang, 2014) [26]; machine learning methods such as the decision tree (DT) and support vector regression (SVR); and item-based collaborative filtering methods based on cosine similarity (CF) (Hu et al, 2016) [27], cluster analysis (Deng and Xu, 2015) [28], and back propagation neural networks (BPNN) (Li et al, 2016) [29]. However, understanding the results is a major challenge in terms of the interpretability of the function modeled by the machine learning algorithm.…”
Section: Models For Estimating Transit Ridershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Jun et al (2015) [21] first evaluated land use characteristics, including the proportions of residential, commercial and office, manufacturing, and mixed land use, within the PCAs of metro stations in the Seoul metropolitan area, and then explored the impact of these characteristics on metro station ridership. Hu et al (2016) [27] examined the association between land use characteristics at two levels of granularity and public transit ridership in Singapore in time and space. The main socio-economics variables used are population, employment, and automobile ownership ratio.…”
Section: Explanatory and Response Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual travel patterns have been used by several studies for inferring the respective trip purpose [9,10,[13][14][15][16]. For instance, Alexander et al [9] infer trip purpose from call detail records (CDRs) which are collected through the use of mobile phones that contain time-stamped geo-coordinates.…”
Section: Inference Based On Individual Travel Patterns and Additionalmentioning
confidence: 99%