2001
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of land redistribution on land management and productivity in the Ethiopian highlands

Abstract: The increasing problem of landlessness in Ethiopia has put pressure on regional governments to redistribute land. In 1997 and 1998, a major land redistribution was undertaken in the Amhara Region, reducing landlessness where implemented. While the impacts of such redistributions have been hotly debated, little empirical evidence exists concerning the actual impacts of redistribution. We find that land redistribution in the Amhara Region has had a positive impact on land productivity, by increasing access to la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is supported by the property right literature that states secured land tenure gives incentives to farmers for applying and continue using land improving investments on their plots (Heltberg, 2001;and Abera, 2003). Contrary to this findings, the study conducted by Benin and Pender (2002) reported that the previous frequent redistribution of land, especially in Amhara Region, hinder the security of land because farmers anticipate similar redistribution of land to occur in the future. As a result the perceived risk of loss of land in the future was negatively associated with farmers' decision to retain introduced conservation structures.…”
Section: Empirical Findingscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This result is supported by the property right literature that states secured land tenure gives incentives to farmers for applying and continue using land improving investments on their plots (Heltberg, 2001;and Abera, 2003). Contrary to this findings, the study conducted by Benin and Pender (2002) reported that the previous frequent redistribution of land, especially in Amhara Region, hinder the security of land because farmers anticipate similar redistribution of land to occur in the future. As a result the perceived risk of loss of land in the future was negatively associated with farmers' decision to retain introduced conservation structures.…”
Section: Empirical Findingscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Impoverishment led them to prefer immediate returns, even if it induced environmental degradation (Taddesse 1995). On the other hand, recent land redistributions in order to allocate landless households had a positive impact on land productivity (Benin and Pender 2001). To increase agricultural production, most trees and shrubs between the farmlands and on steep slopes were cleared during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, thereby increasing runoff and soil erosion (Ståhl 1974;Girma and Jacob 1988;Ståhl 1990).…”
Section: Social and Historical Impulses Of Land Use And Cover Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an additional 21 cases, population size, growth, or distribution was mentioned but not considered an important factor in the intensification process described. A great many of the authors acknowledge Boserupian theoretical foundations in their studies (Benin and Pender, 2001;Benjaminsen, 2001;Goldman, 1993;Guyer and Lambin, 1993;Kunstadter, 1987;Shidong et al, 2001a, b in Tri-Academy), and some explicitly set out to resolve the dispute about the effect of population growth on agricultural production Shorr, 2001;. Echoing the results of the companion study on the causes of tropical deforestation , our study found population size, growth, and density virtually never work in isolation; rather, other social and economic factors mediate between population attributes and agricultural systems.…”
Section: Demographic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%