2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Land Change on Ecosystem Services in the San Antonio River Basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit transfer method (BTM) is one of the most frequently used secondary valuation techniques that adjusts previously recognized estimates from a novel (primary) valuation scholarship in one geographical area to other locations having related socio-ecological attributes [36,37]. The study of Costanza et al [9] is a pioneering work in the BTM that undertakes a per-hectare monetary valuation of different LULC types that possess 16 biomes and provide 17 different ESs.…”
Section: Assignment Of Ecosystem Service Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit transfer method (BTM) is one of the most frequently used secondary valuation techniques that adjusts previously recognized estimates from a novel (primary) valuation scholarship in one geographical area to other locations having related socio-ecological attributes [36,37]. The study of Costanza et al [9] is a pioneering work in the BTM that undertakes a per-hectare monetary valuation of different LULC types that possess 16 biomes and provide 17 different ESs.…”
Section: Assignment Of Ecosystem Service Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESV calculation has become a popular topic in global sustainable development ecological economic and environmental issues [30,31]. Costanza et al (1997) proposed the basic guidance and valuation methods [20].…”
Section: Esv Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, LULC change is the most important reason for the variation of ecological service value. ESV is substantially reduced because of the massive transition of cultivated land and woodland and wetland to construction land, while the ecological function of the former land use type is completely lost, thereby leading to far-reaching consequences of environmental problems [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some scholars have tried to estimate the impact of land-use change on residents' well-being (especially farmers) or social equity [15,23,24], the loss of well-being caused by rural-urban land conversion is often expressed in economic dimension, falling short in capturing ecological dimension. A few pieces of research have called for constructing ecological compensation for human well-being loss based on the non-market value and externality theory [25,26], while empirical evidence for quantifying the loss of residents' well-being loss needs to be explored to clarify the negative impacts of rural-urban land conversion.Human well-being is a multi-dimensional concept that reflects the extent to which individuals satisfy with their life generally and with different aspects of their life [27,28]. According to the definition given by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), human well-being is a human experience that includes the sense of security, basic materials for a good life, freedom of choice and action, health, and good social relations [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some scholars have tried to estimate the impact of land-use change on residents' well-being (especially farmers) or social equity [15,23,24], the loss of well-being caused by rural-urban land conversion is often expressed in economic dimension, falling short in capturing ecological dimension. A few pieces of research have called for constructing ecological compensation for human well-being loss based on the non-market value and externality theory [25,26], while empirical evidence for quantifying the loss of residents' well-being loss needs to be explored to clarify the negative impacts of rural-urban land conversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%