Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-018-0772-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of improved maize varieties in Nigeria: ex-post assessment of productivity and welfare outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure to account for the potential endogenous selection bias in the outcome equations may, therefore, result in biased and inconsistent estimators. Past studies have applied both semi-parametric and parametric approaches that take account of the potential self-selection problem (Abdoulaye, Wossen, & Awotide, ;Ainembabazi et al, 2018;Ali & Abdulai, 2010;Asfaw, Kassie, Simtowe, & Lipper, 2012;Becerril & Abdulai, 2010;Feleke, Manyong, Abdoulaye, & Alene, 2016;Khonje, Manda, Alene, & Kassie, 2015;Manda et al, 2019;Shiferaw et al, 2014;Tufa et al, 2019;Wossen et al, 2017). In this study, we use the parametric approach (endogenous switching regression model), and semi-parametric (propensity score matching) approaches, with the latter being used as a robustness check to the results of the former.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to account for the potential endogenous selection bias in the outcome equations may, therefore, result in biased and inconsistent estimators. Past studies have applied both semi-parametric and parametric approaches that take account of the potential self-selection problem (Abdoulaye, Wossen, & Awotide, ;Ainembabazi et al, 2018;Ali & Abdulai, 2010;Asfaw, Kassie, Simtowe, & Lipper, 2012;Becerril & Abdulai, 2010;Feleke, Manyong, Abdoulaye, & Alene, 2016;Khonje, Manda, Alene, & Kassie, 2015;Manda et al, 2019;Shiferaw et al, 2014;Tufa et al, 2019;Wossen et al, 2017). In this study, we use the parametric approach (endogenous switching regression model), and semi-parametric (propensity score matching) approaches, with the latter being used as a robustness check to the results of the former.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that wealthier households could afford costlier technologies. As argued by (Abdoulaye et al 2018), wealth status of farmers play significant roles in the adoption of farm technology in most developing countries. As a result, it is expected that food-secure households with a high number of assets are likely to be more technically efficient.…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, major agricultural interventions and efforts have been geared towards increasing productivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). For example, the development, dissemination, and adoption of the improved crop varieties and fertilizer technologies have been widely promoted across the region (Abdoulaye et al 2018;Ogunniyi et al 2015;Lunduka et al 2017). However, low productivity still characterizes the agricultural sector in the region (FAO 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological change is critical for agricultural productivity growth and poverty reduction in developing countries especially in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Gollin et al, 2002;Alene et al, 2009;Suri, 2011;Zeng et al, 2015). It is widely recognised that the development and dissemination of improved crop varieties and complementary agronomic practices are major drivers of smallholder agricultural productivity growth (Alene et al, 2009;Suri, 2011;Zeng et al, 2015;Kassie et al, 2017;Abdoulaye et al, 2018). However, empirical evidence on the relationship between agricultural research and poverty reduction suggests that improved agricultural technologies may not necessarily lead to poverty reduction as the poor are often constrained by structural barriers that make improved technologies inaccessible and less profitable for them (Suri, 2011;Zeng et al, 2015;Kassie et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%