2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.04.350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of hypercapnia and temperature on physiological performance of marine invertebrates from the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the background fluctuations is particularly important in species-poor, marginal systems like the Baltic Sea, because (i) abiotic variability is pronounced due to the small size of the water body, to the highly variable wind-driven current system (Lehmann et al, 2011) and to the reduced buffer capacity of brackish water (Thomsen et al, 2009(Thomsen et al, , 2010BACC author group, 2008), and because (ii) low species rich-ness -especially when combined to low functional richnessmakes communities more vulnerable to environmental shifts (e.g. Wahl et al, 2011a), since functional gaps caused by the decline of a species cannot always be filled by a functionally equivalent species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the background fluctuations is particularly important in species-poor, marginal systems like the Baltic Sea, because (i) abiotic variability is pronounced due to the small size of the water body, to the highly variable wind-driven current system (Lehmann et al, 2011) and to the reduced buffer capacity of brackish water (Thomsen et al, 2009(Thomsen et al, , 2010BACC author group, 2008), and because (ii) low species rich-ness -especially when combined to low functional richnessmakes communities more vulnerable to environmental shifts (e.g. Wahl et al, 2011a), since functional gaps caused by the decline of a species cannot always be filled by a functionally equivalent species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the background fluctuations is particularly important in species-poor, marginal systems like the Baltic Sea, because (i) abiotic variability is pronounced due to the small size of the water body, to the highly variable wind-driven current system (Lehmann et al, 2011) and to the reduced buffer capacity of brackish water (Thomsen et al, 2009(Thomsen et al, , 2010BACC author group, 2008), and because (ii) low species richness -especially when combined to low functional richnessmakes communities more vulnerable to environmental shifts (e.g. Wahl et al, 2011a), since functional gaps caused by the decline of a species cannot always be filled by a functionally equivalent species (e.g.…”
Section: Wahl Et Al: Natural Variability In Hard-bottom Communitimentioning
confidence: 99%