2011
DOI: 10.3141/2216-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Holding Control Strategies on Transit Performance

Abstract: Transit operators are interested in strategies to improve service reliability as it is an important measure of performance and level of service. One of the common practices aimed at reducing service unreliability is holding control strategies. The design of these strategies involves the selection of a set of time point stops and the holding criteria for regulating the departure time. The interactions between passenger activity, transit operations, and traffic dynamics must be dynamically modeled to analyze the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly applied delay preservation prediction scheme assumes AT j,k+1 = AT m,k+1 + SRT mj , where AT m,k+1 denotes the arrival time at the last visited stop m and SRT mj is the scheduled riding time between m and j. Parameter α is a threshold ratio that determines the minimum allowed headway with values varying from 0.6 to 0.8 as found by previous studies [3,7]. In previous simulation [7,14] and field experiment [9] studies, the even headway strategy outperformed schedule-based strategies and demonstrated robust results.…”
Section: B Even Headway Holding Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The commonly applied delay preservation prediction scheme assumes AT j,k+1 = AT m,k+1 + SRT mj , where AT m,k+1 denotes the arrival time at the last visited stop m and SRT mj is the scheduled riding time between m and j. Parameter α is a threshold ratio that determines the minimum allowed headway with values varying from 0.6 to 0.8 as found by previous studies [3,7]. In previous simulation [7,14] and field experiment [9] studies, the even headway strategy outperformed schedule-based strategies and demonstrated robust results.…”
Section: B Even Headway Holding Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The even headway strategy is currently used for the trunk lines in Stockholm. This strategy was implemented following a series of simulation and field experiment studies [7]. An empirical analysis of the performance of this strategy demonstrated that it resulted in passenger travel time savings when compared with the previous schedule-based holding control.…”
Section: B Scenario Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finding the optimal holding strategy has been the focus of many studies, see a review of strategies in Strathman et al (2001). Cats et al (2012) test different holding strategies in terms of holding criteria and time point and find that headway-based strategies are superior to schedule-based strategies. Reliability is further improved by adapting holding to both the preceding and following bus.…”
Section: Planning and Technology Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on transit operations, Toledo et al (2010) evaluate the effects of varying passenger demand and travel time uncertainty on on-time performance and headway reliability of transit vehicles. Cats et al (2012) and Fernandez et al (2010) investigates the effects of various holding strategies on passengers in terms of headway variability, travel time and waiting times. Cats (2016) evaluate the effects of a network extension on crowding in transit vehicles.…”
Section: The Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%