2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Governance Structure Strategies on the Performance of Construction Joint Ventures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, cost, schedule and quality were selected as the objective indicators to evaluate ICJV project performance. In order to measure ICJV project performance from both objective and subjective aspects, client satisfaction which was used by numerous researchers in the context of ICJV projects was selected as the subjective indicator to evaluate ICJV project performance (Bener and Glaister, 2010b; Lin and Ho, 2012; Mohamed, 2003; Ozorhon et al , 2010). In this research, ICJV project performance is measured by respondents' perceptions of cost, schedule, quality and client satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, cost, schedule and quality were selected as the objective indicators to evaluate ICJV project performance. In order to measure ICJV project performance from both objective and subjective aspects, client satisfaction which was used by numerous researchers in the context of ICJV projects was selected as the subjective indicator to evaluate ICJV project performance (Bener and Glaister, 2010b; Lin and Ho, 2012; Mohamed, 2003; Ozorhon et al , 2010). In this research, ICJV project performance is measured by respondents' perceptions of cost, schedule, quality and client satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CJVs are frequent in large-scale projects, which induces a managerial challenge. To deal with this, two governance structures were observed: integrated joint-ventures characterized by shared decision-making and high coordination; and non-integrated joint-ventures where each partner makes their own decisions and there is no need for higher levels of coordination [42,43].…”
Section: Joint Ventures (Jvs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oliver (1997) emphasized that quality of an organization's relationship with its task environment (developers, subcontractors, suppliers, and banks) positively affects the profitability and productivity. More recently, Lin & Ho (2013) stated that, in the construction industry, jointly managed joint-ventures perform slightly better than separately managed ones. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research on SMEs in this field.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Cooperation and Company Performancementioning
confidence: 99%