Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability

Abstract

Increasing efficiency in livestock production and reducing the share of animal products in human consumption are two strategies to curb the adverse environmental impacts of the livestock sector. Here, we explore the room for sustainable livestock production by modelling the impacts and constraints of a third strategy in which livestock feed components that compete with direct human food crop production are reduced. Thus, in the outmost scenario, animals are fed only from grassland and by-products from food production. We show that this strategy could provide sufficient food (equal amounts of human-digestible energy and a similar protein/calorie ratio as in the reference scenario for 2050) and reduce environmental impacts compared with the reference scenario (in the most extreme case of zero human-edible concentrate feed: greenhouse gas emissions −18%; arable land occupation −26%, N-surplus −46%; P-surplus −40%; non-renewable energy use −36%, pesticide use intensity −22%, freshwater use −21%, soil erosion potential −12%). These results occur despite the fact that environmental efficiency of livestock production is reduced compared with the reference scenario, which is the consequence of the grassland-based feed for ruminants and the less optimal feeding rations based on by-products for non-ruminants. This apparent contradiction results from considerable reductions of animal products in human diets (protein intake per capita from livestock products reduced by 71%). We show that such a strategy focusing on feed components which do not compete with direct human food consumption offers a viable complement to strategies focusing on increased efficiency in production or reduced shares of animal products in consumption.

The climatic impact of food consumption in a representative sample of Irish adults and implications for food and nutrition policy

“…Moreover, other on-farm mitigation measures could lower emissions further (99) . Ireland has implemented a sustainable food programme which enables farmers and producers to set and achieve sustainability targets by providing a framework to deliver long-term improvements in areas such as emissions mitigation with the aim of reducing GHGE associated with food production (100) .…”

Review: Deciphering animal robustness. A synthesis to facilitate its use in livestock breeding and management

“…The challenge of food security for the expanding human population will inevitably reduce the use of human-edible foodstuffs for feeding livestock as well as the use of land suitable for growing cereals to provide grazing or forage for livestock (Schader et al, 2015). At the same time, climate change predictions indicate a greater expected frequency of environmental perturbations (Hansen et al, 2012).…”

“…For instance, Sewalem et al (2008) documented a greater culling risk in Canadian dairy cows that experienced calving difficulty or reduced reproductive performance. This means that a robust Canadian cow should calve without assistance and have good reproductive performance.…”

Opinion paper: Are we on the right track toward livestock sector sustainability?

“…Furthermore, we need to increase the utilization of non-human-edible foods. An extensive study evaluating different scenarios based on the use/non-use of human-edible foods given to livestock shows that comprehensive gains would be made by avoiding use of human-edible foods, including reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 18%, occupation of arable land by 26%, N-surplus by 46%; P-surplus by 40%, pesticide use intensity by 22% and freshwater use by 21% (Schader et al, 2015).…”