2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of cropping practices on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields in China: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
91
4
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
91
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, while fertilization could increase emissions of GHG such as NO2 or CH4, those emissions could potentially be offset by the carbon sink created by faster growing sisal plants. In this case study, the usage of the biogas production residual as fertilizer would minimize additional GHG emissions, in accordance with (Feng, et al, 2013), which found that biogas residues have low GHG emissions compared to other fertilizers. It is difficult however to estimate the impacts of irrigation and fertilization without additional experimental data.…”
Section: Productive Uses Scenariosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, while fertilization could increase emissions of GHG such as NO2 or CH4, those emissions could potentially be offset by the carbon sink created by faster growing sisal plants. In this case study, the usage of the biogas production residual as fertilizer would minimize additional GHG emissions, in accordance with (Feng, et al, 2013), which found that biogas residues have low GHG emissions compared to other fertilizers. It is difficult however to estimate the impacts of irrigation and fertilization without additional experimental data.…”
Section: Productive Uses Scenariosupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Only a 2 % mitigation of CH 4 emissions from no-tillage in this 5-year period was simulated. In a meta-analysis of CH 4 emissions in Chinese rice fields, Feng et al (2013) also reported that no-tillage could reduce CH 4 emissions by 26 % in comparison to conventional tillage. Li et al (2011) attributed the lower CH 4 emissions in no-tillage system to higher soil bulk density and lower dissolved organic carbon content, which could restrict substrate availability for methanogenesis.…”
Section: Methane Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a moderate increase in planting density with less basal N application could make a trade-off between CH4 production and oxidation, resulting in the lowest CH4 emissions level among the treatments at the three tested sites. Recent findings from literature exhibits that N rates with optimal grain yield have no net effect on CH4 emission due to the counter-balanced by the positive effect of N addition on CH4 production and oxidation (Banger et al, 2012;Linquist et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2013;Pittelkow et al, 2014). That may be true in farmer's fields, but specifically as in present study for CK and DR1 with optimal yield, only basal and tillering N was decreased and the panicle N application was the same for both CK and DR1, which may results in inhibitory effect of reduced N application on CH4 oxidation only occurred at tillering stage; in addition, the negative effect of reduced N application on CH4 oxidation may be modified by deficiency of oxygen for Methanotrophs due to continuous flooding at tillering stage (Banger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rice, yield-scaled GWP is mainly decided by CH4 emission and rice yield, since CH4 emission is the major contributor to GWP (Linquist et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2013;Pittelkow et al, 2013). It was reported that yield-scaled GWP was minimized at optimal N rates with maximum yield (Pittelkow et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%