Impacts of community stakeholder engagement interventions in Ugandan oil extractives

Parker, Rani; Synergies, Business-Community; Coleman, Eric A.; Manyindo, Jacob; Mukuru, Emmanuel; Schultz, Bill; Jamii, Maendeleo ya

doi:10.23846/tw8ie97

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies claimed that the chosen research methods allowed them to address spillover effects. The authors explained that spillover effects can pose a challenge when interpreting results as they can take multiple forms with different sizes and directions, increasing the risk of bias of the treatment effects (Asunka et al, 2019;Blattman et al, 2018;Coleman et al, 2019;Parker et al, 2019).…”

Section: Making Claims About the Choice Of Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, theory was used to justify the certainty and impact of claims across several studies (n=7). This was done through a return to the theory of change (Béné et al, 2020;Cocciolo et al, 2020;Parker et al, 2019) or an examination of the consistency of results with established theories (Amirapu et al, 2020;Belissa et al, 2019;Berhane et al, 2017;Gibbs et al, 2020).…”

Section: Making and Justifying Claims About Intervention Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, Mvukiyehe and van der Windt (2020) used the study sample size to stress the validity of claims: 'Second, the size of the experiment we study here is much larger…significantly increasing statistical precision and decreasing the possibility for Type-II errors ' (p. 14). Five studies used the general strengths of their chosen study designs or intervention techniques as evidence of strong research (Avdeenko and Frölich, 2019;Bandiera et al, 2017;Morten et al, 2020;Parker et al, 2019;Robertson, 2019).…”

Section: Making and Justifying Claims About Intervention Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, one mixed-methods study evaluating community building and humanitarian aid interventions in Pakistan explained the benefits of the RCT for establishing causality based on the post-intervention differences. At the same time, the authors of three studies claimed that qualitative research had an explanatory power to corroborate the observed quantitative findings, clarify possible contradictions in quantitative results, contextualise the quantitative findings in their cultural and local circumstances, and gain a deeper understanding of participants' perceptions (Avdeenko and Frölich, 2019;Berhane et al, 2017;Parker et al, 2019).…”

Section: Making Claims About the Choice Of Study Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies implied that the nature of randomisation could make studies rigorous and relevant (Asfaw et al, 2017;Blattman et al, 2018;Källander et al, 2021;McKenzie, 2017;Parker et al, 2019;Pellegrini, 2018;Piper et al, 2018), particularly when the availability of evidence is limited, such as in a conflict-affected setting (Gibbs et al, 2020). To justify claims about the quality and validity of the study findings, the authors ensured that their data collection and data analysis were appropriate, sensitive to local contexts (Angeles, 2019), addressed ethical issues, mitigated potential biases (Avdeenko and Frölich, 2019;Pellegrini, 2018), avoided overstating precision (Blattman et al, 2018), and triangulated data from different sources or methods (Barnett et al, 2018;Dar et al, 2020;Saboya et al, 2018).…”

Section: Making Claims About Quality and Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Making and justifying evidence claims: evidence synthesis of impact evaluations and systematic reviews in international development

Bangpan¹,

Draper²,

Minchenko³

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few decades, there has been an increasing use of, and demand for, high-quality evidence among decision makers in international development. Evidence from research leads to claims about the effects of intervening in people’s lives to improve specific outcomes. However, this raises the question of how such evidence claims are framed, justified and communicated. This review aims to address this important question by reviewing research findings from impact evaluations and systematic reviews to understand the nature and the scope of evidence claims in the global South.

show abstract

Section: Making Claims About the Choice Of Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Making and Justifying Claims About Intervention Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Making and Justifying Claims About Intervention Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Making Claims About the Choice Of Study Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Making Claims About Quality and Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Making and justifying evidence claims: evidence synthesis of impact evaluations and systematic reviews in international development

Bangpan¹,

Draper²,

Minchenko³

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bridging the academic-practitioner gap in RCTs

Parker¹,

Coleman

Manyindo³

et al. 2020

World Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governing the Interlinkages between the SDGs

Breuer¹,

Malerba²,

Balasubramanian³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This book is a fresh, timely and thought-provoking analysis of this challenging dimension, in particular the policy and institutional innovations required. It is a very welcome and valuable resource." Ambassador David Donoghue, Permanent Representative of Ireland to the UN 2013-2017 and co-facilitator of the UN negotiations on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development "The book provides an excellent analysis of governance mechanisms and policy processes that effectively promote sustainable development. This is extremely important for advancing action on the SDGs, despite the Covid-19 pandemic and increasing pressures of climate change." Prof. Dr. Imme Scholz, Co-Chair of the UN Independent Group of Scientists for the Global Sustainable Development Report 2023 and Co-Chair of the German Sustainability Council (RNE) "This book helps to deepen our understanding of the governance and policy innovations that are needed to support policy coherence across sectors and actors at different levels to deliver on Agenda 2030." Alina Rocha Menocal, Principal Research Fellow at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and Director of the global Thinking and Working Community of Practice (TWP CoP) GOVERNING THE INTERLINKAGES BETWEEN THE SDGSGoverning the Interlinkages between the SDGs: Approaches, Opportunities and Challenges identifies the institutional processes, governance mechanisms and policy mixes that are conducive to devising strategies of integrated Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation.The book edited by Anita Breuer, Daniele Malerba, Srinivasa Srigiri, and Pooja Balasu bramanian examines the dedicated policies targeting the SDGs, as well as political and institutional drivers of synergies and trade-offs between the SDGs in selected key areasboth cross-nationally and in specific country contexts. Their analysis moves beyond the focus on links between SDG indicators and targets. Instead, the book takes advantage of recent evidence from the initial imple mentation phase of the SDGs and each chapter explores the question of which political-institutional prerequisites, governance mechanisms, and policy instruments are suited to accelerate the imple mentation of the SDGs. The findings presented are intended to both inform high-level policy debates and to provide orientation for practitioners working on development cooperation. This volume will be of great interest to practitioners and policy makers in the field of sustainable development, as well as academics in the fields of sustainability research, political science, and economics.Anita Breuer is a senior researcher at the German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), leading the inter-disciplinary research project "Implementing the 2030 Agenda: Inte grating Growth, Environment, Equality and Governance". Her primary research interests involve sustainability governance, democracy promotion, accountability, and participatory pol itics, as well as the impact of digitalization on political behavior and collective action.Daniele Malerba is a senior ...

show abstract

Impacts of community stakeholder engagement interventions in Ugandan oil extractives

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Making and justifying evidence claims: evidence synthesis of impact evaluations and systematic reviews in international development

Making and justifying evidence claims: evidence synthesis of impact evaluations and systematic reviews in international development

Bridging the academic-practitioner gap in RCTs

Governing the Interlinkages between the SDGs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About