2016
DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of climate change on sub-regional electricity demand and distribution in the southern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, impacts to California's peak period infrastructure do not necessarily reflect overall electricity supply adequacy at the interconnection scale. Reference [27] investigate spatially explicit changes in electricity load at the neighborhood scale using high-resolution downscaled climate model output in the Southeastern United States. Dirks et al [4] use a highly detailed building energy model to assess climate effects on peak electricity load in the Eastern Interconnection using one climate model scenario [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, impacts to California's peak period infrastructure do not necessarily reflect overall electricity supply adequacy at the interconnection scale. Reference [27] investigate spatially explicit changes in electricity load at the neighborhood scale using high-resolution downscaled climate model output in the Southeastern United States. Dirks et al [4] use a highly detailed building energy model to assess climate effects on peak electricity load in the Eastern Interconnection using one climate model scenario [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates to date have focused primarily on aggregate consumption impacts, using state-level monthly averages of residential electricity load (8,9), high-frequency data at the single-state or regional level (10)(11)(12)(13), and residential billing data from electric utilities (14). The majority of this literature is based on California and the American South.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, studies based on multisector models typically focus on annual electricity demands without capturing the effects of temperature change at subannual scales, such as daily and seasonal peak demands 1,2,[12][13][14][15][16][17] (Supplementary Note 1). Second, studies using econometric and empirical methods typically do not account for changes in socioeconomics (population, income), technological advances, fuel prices, and infrastructure (e.g., transportation infrastructure) development 8,11,[18][19][20][21][22][23] . Finally, studies using power-sector focused tools do not account for multisectoral interactions, including the impacts of broader socioeconomic trends on energy service demands, economic competition among fuels to meet those demands (e.g., competition between electricity and natural gas use for heating in buildings), and implications of global commodity and fuel markets [24][25][26][27] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%