2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01197-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Channel Morphodynamics on Fish Habitat Utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bankfull level was estimated in the field where an abrupt change in cross slope and vegetation cover were observed. The bankfull depth is approximately 1.1 m. Parsapour‐moghaddam et al () measured a flow of 1.368 m 3 /s, thalweg depth of 1.1 m, and estimated this flow to be just below bankfull. Therefore, the bankfull discharge is approximately 1.4 m 3 /s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bankfull level was estimated in the field where an abrupt change in cross slope and vegetation cover were observed. The bankfull depth is approximately 1.1 m. Parsapour‐moghaddam et al () measured a flow of 1.368 m 3 /s, thalweg depth of 1.1 m, and estimated this flow to be just below bankfull. Therefore, the bankfull discharge is approximately 1.4 m 3 /s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow data were collected at WC4 in 2014 and 2015 as part of a sediment erodibility study (Parsapour‐moghaddam et al, ; Rennie, ). Those five flows were augmented with three more measurements in 2016 and 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those problems in the tailrace have been mitigated by the use of a fish screen during the turbine stop/startup procedures, together with regular fish monitoring immediately downstream of the dam (Suzuki et al, 2017). Finally, 2D and 3D hydrodynamic models have been used to evaluate fish habitats (Parsapour-Moghaddam et al, 2019) and are a potential tool for evaluating dam impacts on migratory fish movement (Gisen et al, 2017) despite uncertainties inherent in modeling (Gard, 2009;Boavida et al, 2013). The 2D models can be created and ran faster than 3D models though the latter has the ability to model vertical nearbed flows (Kasvi et al, 2015) and turbulence (Alvarez et al, 2017), which has already been described as an important hydraulic variable linked to fish swimming capacity (Lacey et al, 2012).…”
Section: Prochilodus Costatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the analysis of hydrodynamic flow in tailraces and areas located just downstream of HPPs is important in tropical areas for purposes of informing the mitigation actions or even the planning of HPP decommissioning. Several studies have applied numerical models in 2D (Rodriguez et al, 2004;Alho & Mäkinen, 2010;Kasvi et al, 2015) and 3D (Kasvi et al, 2015;Alvarez et al, 2017;Parsapour-Moghaddam & Rennie, 2018;Parsapour-Moghaddam et al, 2019) to simulate the flow in river reaches and also in areas located close to dams (Gisen et al, 2017). Due to the elevated computational cost of the 3D model in terms of calibration, these models are now widely applied to predict the hydrodynamics of small spacetime domains (Parsapour-Moghaddam & Rennie, 2018), while 2D models are more accessible over large distances because they have a low computational cost (Yi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%