2015
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2015.1067183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of carbon pricing on income inequality in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been a subdued conversation within debates about integrated assessment models (IAMs) generally [47,49,56,59,60], there have been multiple efforts to improve the representation of equity in these models [4,[61][62][63][64]. Similarly, a number of groups have explicitly included equity in national modelling efforts [65,66]. In this section, we juxtapose the framework of equity elements developed above with existing modelling practices.…”
Section: What Existing Modelling Efforts Can and Cannot Tell Us Aboutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it has been a subdued conversation within debates about integrated assessment models (IAMs) generally [47,49,56,59,60], there have been multiple efforts to improve the representation of equity in these models [4,[61][62][63][64]. Similarly, a number of groups have explicitly included equity in national modelling efforts [65,66]. In this section, we juxtapose the framework of equity elements developed above with existing modelling practices.…”
Section: What Existing Modelling Efforts Can and Cannot Tell Us Aboutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, national modelling has been better at including the context specific characteristics needed to identify heterogeneous costs such as imperfect employment and energy system structures [65,95]. Some national modelling has also explored strategies for mitigating policy costs imposed on low income populations through mitigation action [66,71,96]. National modelling has also allowed for the analysis of co-benefits in developing [93,97,98] and developed [99] countries, much of this emerging from south-south collaborations [100].…”
Section: (Iii) Heterogeneous Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, many IAMs face structural challenges including context-specific aspects of non-climate co-benefits or costs. 22 There is also a "bottom-up" literature 23 , designed around national circumstances and policy, which conducts country-scale investigation of development and ambitious climate objectives for a wide range of countries across Asia [24][25][26][27][28] , Latin America [29][30][31][32][33][34] , Africa 35,36 , Europe [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and North America. [44][45][46][47][48][49] Several studies describe multi-country exercises in which country teams co-explored their domestic pathways.…”
Section: Methodological Challenges To Inform the Post-paris Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been widely recognized that poorer segments of society are generally more vulnerable to negative climate impacts, especially where such events interact with and amplify non-climatic stressors (Olsson et al, 2014). It has also been argued that the costs of emissions reduction policies may further negatively impact the poorest households, absent measures to offset the distributional impacts of those policies (Grottera et al 2017;Goulder 2013;Büchs et al 2011;Callan et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%