2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of assimilating observations from connected vehicles into a numerical weather prediction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crowdsourcing may provide new, inexpensive sources of observations (Hintz, Vedel, & Kaas, 2019). For example, private citizen's automatic weather stations (Chapman et al, 2017), surface pressure observations from mobile phones (e.g., Hintz, O'Boyle, et al, 2019) and temperature observations from cars or other vehicles (Bell et al, 2022; Siems‐Anderson et al, 2020), are potentially useful sources of observations for convection‐permitting DA. However, there are complex issues regarding data ownership and privacy, quality control (particularly for moving observing platforms such as mobile phones and cars), and dealing with large data volumes to be resolved before these data will see widespread use in NWP.…”
Section: Outlook and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowdsourcing may provide new, inexpensive sources of observations (Hintz, Vedel, & Kaas, 2019). For example, private citizen's automatic weather stations (Chapman et al, 2017), surface pressure observations from mobile phones (e.g., Hintz, O'Boyle, et al, 2019) and temperature observations from cars or other vehicles (Bell et al, 2022; Siems‐Anderson et al, 2020), are potentially useful sources of observations for convection‐permitting DA. However, there are complex issues regarding data ownership and privacy, quality control (particularly for moving observing platforms such as mobile phones and cars), and dealing with large data volumes to be resolved before these data will see widespread use in NWP.…”
Section: Outlook and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of crowd‐sourced observations in atmospheric sciences, NWP included, is becoming increasingly widespread. In recent years, several study areas of interest have emerged, such as the use of pressure observations from smartphones (Hintz et al, 2019; Mass & Madaus, 2014; McNicholas & Mass, 2018), the quantification of the urban heat island effect (Meier et al, 2017; Steeneveld et al, 2011), the use of crowd‐sourced wind observations (Droste et al, 2020; Hintz et al, 2020), the use of vehicle observations for assimilation in NWP models (Siems‐Anderson et al, 2020), and the use of PWSs for post‐processing of NWP forecasts (Nipen et al, 2020). Here, we are using crowd‐sourced observations from PWSs in order to post‐process near‐surface temperature forecasts.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of vehicle-based observations in NWP is still in its infancy, but their use for nowcasting has been investigated by the German weather service (DWD) (Hintz et al, 2019a). Additionally, an observing simulation system experiment conducted by Siems- Anderson et al (2020) showed a modest but appreciable impact from assimilating simulated vehicle-based observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%