Animal Waste Utilization 1997
DOI: 10.1201/9781439822630.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Animal Manure Management on Ground and Surface Water Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, both treatments involving application of pig slurry had significantly lower P concentrations in the drainage water than when only mineral P was applied (p < 0.001; table 5 and figure 4). For even higher P application rates, the results might be different, but other studies have also shown that large applications of manure do not increase P leaching or even result in reduced P losses (Sharpley et al 1998;Bergström and Kirchmann 2006). Sharpley et al (2004b) suggested that longterm manure application may change P sorption characteristics, due to increased Ca content in the soil, resulting in smaller amounts of water-extractable PO 4 -P. In the present study, the higher Ca-AL content in the treatment with a high rate of pig slurry may support these findings (table 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Furthermore, both treatments involving application of pig slurry had significantly lower P concentrations in the drainage water than when only mineral P was applied (p < 0.001; table 5 and figure 4). For even higher P application rates, the results might be different, but other studies have also shown that large applications of manure do not increase P leaching or even result in reduced P losses (Sharpley et al 1998;Bergström and Kirchmann 2006). Sharpley et al (2004b) suggested that longterm manure application may change P sorption characteristics, due to increased Ca content in the soil, resulting in smaller amounts of water-extractable PO 4 -P. In the present study, the higher Ca-AL content in the treatment with a high rate of pig slurry may support these findings (table 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The lack of difference in runoff between manured (CP) and unmanured (CT) plots is consistent with Gilley et al (1999), who found similar cumulative runoff for both manured and unmanured treatments after long-term applications of manure. NH 4 -N load (1996), b = NH 4 -N load (1997-1998), c = TKN load (1996), d = TKN load (1997-1998. Arrows indicate time of fall manure application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second strategy is preventive and more reliable with respect to residual N. It focuses on a reserved N application and is based on the knowledge that the amount of residual soil N strongly depends on the applied N rates (Jokela and Randall, 1989), that the nitrate pool should at all times be kept as low as possible to avoid losses (Sharpley et al, 1998) and that the apparent nitrogen recovery of silage maize is low (Schröder, 1998). This N balancing remains a major challenge since a reduction of the maize crop N supply may well decrease the amount of residual N significantly (Dinnes et al, 2002) but at the same time it potentially reduces the crop yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%