2008
DOI: 10.1175/2007jamc1760.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of a New Solar Radiation Parameterization on the CPTEC AGCM Climatological Features

Abstract: We investigate the impacts of an improved atmospheric absorption on radiative fluxes, atmospheric circulation and hydrological cycle for long-term GCM integrations. For these runs we use the operational version of the CPTEC AGCM and its enhanced version with a new solar radiation scheme. There is an 8% increase in the annual mean global average atmospheric absorption in the enhanced integration as compared with the operational model integration. The extra absorption is due to gases (0.5%), water vapor continuu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the values of the bias derived from 48 CMIP5 models are similar, at 8.6 and 11.9 W m −2 compared with GEBA without and with observations over China, respectively. This may be attributed to an underestimation of clouds in the climate simulations in CMIP5 over land [ Barbosa et al ., ; Bodas‐Salcedo et al ., , ; Klein et al ., ; Lauer and Hamilton , ; Pueschel et al ., ; Wild and Roeckner , ]. In addition, it has been shown that the clear‐sky fluxes over land in global climate models are too high (Figure ), a known long standing problem in climate modeling [ Wild et al ., , , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the values of the bias derived from 48 CMIP5 models are similar, at 8.6 and 11.9 W m −2 compared with GEBA without and with observations over China, respectively. This may be attributed to an underestimation of clouds in the climate simulations in CMIP5 over land [ Barbosa et al ., ; Bodas‐Salcedo et al ., , ; Klein et al ., ; Lauer and Hamilton , ; Pueschel et al ., ; Wild and Roeckner , ]. In addition, it has been shown that the clear‐sky fluxes over land in global climate models are too high (Figure ), a known long standing problem in climate modeling [ Wild et al ., , , ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplified physical parameterization schemes used in BAM‐v0 in comparison to the first operational version (BAM‐v1) are: shortwave radiation CLIRAD scheme (Chou and Suarez, ) modified by Tarasova and Fomin () and validated by Barbosa et al . (), longwave radiation (Harshvardhan et al ., ), cloud microphysics (Ferrier et al . ), deep convection (Grell and Dévényi, ), shallow convection (Tiedtke, ), total cloud fraction (Slingo, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model overestimated the net short wave radiation related to the underestimation of the clouds fraction, subject discussed in Tarasova and Cavalcanti (2002). The implementation of CLIRAD scheme for solar radiation reduced the bias in several variables, as shown in Barbosa et al (2008). The evolution of this model led to the AGCM3, which was used in studies of vegetation changes in Amazonia (Sampaio et al, 2007), experiments of sea ice anomalies in Antarctica (Cunningham and Bonatti, 2011), seasonal predictions (Coelho et al, 2012) and probabilistic global operational NWP (Cunningham et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model uses a deep cloud convection parameterization scheme developed by Kuo () and the short wave radiation scheme as described in Barbosa et al . (). Ensemble hindcasts for the period 1979–2008 were produced using a lagged initialization approach based on 10 atmospheric initial conditions from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (Kalnay et al ., ; Kanamitsu et al ., ).…”
Section: Verification Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%