2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaab40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of 1.5 versus 2.0 °C on cereal yields in the West African Sudan Savanna

Abstract: To reduce the risks of climate change, governments agreed in the Paris Agreement to limit global temperature rise to less than 2.0 • C above pre-industrial levels, with the ambition to keep warming to 1.5 • C. Charting appropriate mitigation responses requires information on the costs of mitigating versus associated damages for the two levels of warming. In this assessment, a critical consideration is the impact on crop yields and yield variability in regions currently challenged by food insecurity. The curren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
61
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, an increase in the frequency of crop failures has been shown with 1.5°C global warming above the pre‐industrial period for maize, millet, and sorghum in West Africa (Parkes, Defrance, Sultan, Ciais, & Wang, ). On the other hand, Faye et al () did not detect a change in yield variability for the same three crops in West African between the 1.5 and 2.0°C warming scenarios using HAPPI climate data. In our study, the change in climate extremes occurs due to projected shifts in mean temperatures (which bring wheat cropping systems closer to heat stress thresholds) as well as shifts in the distribution of daily temperatures, which can increase or decrease the frequency of future heat waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, an increase in the frequency of crop failures has been shown with 1.5°C global warming above the pre‐industrial period for maize, millet, and sorghum in West Africa (Parkes, Defrance, Sultan, Ciais, & Wang, ). On the other hand, Faye et al () did not detect a change in yield variability for the same three crops in West African between the 1.5 and 2.0°C warming scenarios using HAPPI climate data. In our study, the change in climate extremes occurs due to projected shifts in mean temperatures (which bring wheat cropping systems closer to heat stress thresholds) as well as shifts in the distribution of daily temperatures, which can increase or decrease the frequency of future heat waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In Africa, existing studies for the DSSAT CERES Millet model, largely concentrated in the west SSA, evaluate pearl millet crop for +1.5 and +2 • C temperature scenarios [29,32]. Aiming to understand the risk associated with the two temperature scenarios [32] and evaluate it in relation to current fertilizer use against intensification. Their recommendations that higher yields will be obtained under intensification are in line with [29], who warn about the production risks associated with non-adopters of crop management strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Decision Support System for Agro-technological Transfer (DSSAT) is a highly-ranked crop model capable of simulating different cropping strategies in semi-arid agro-climatic regions [30,31]. DSSAT models (calibrated and validated) are frequently used to assess the sensitivity of different crops to abiotic stresses [26,27] and to evaluate crop management strategies for current weather conditions and future scenarios [18,32]. However, to our understanding, the DSSAT CERES Millet model is not yet calibrated and evaluated in the East African region (EA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Dosio et al (2018) projected a significant increase of heat wave magnitude over this region even under the 1.5°C target. Only few studies compared changes between the two warming targets with a focus over West Africa, but was limited to the issue of wet and dry spells (Klutse et al, 2018) and crop yields (Faye et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%