2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaction Bone Grafting or Uncemented Modular Stems for the Treatment of Type B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures? A Complication Rate Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diaz-Dilernia et al showed modular, distally fixed stems to be superior to impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique in treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures. 21 They found a significant association between surgical technique and complication rate with IBG having and odds ratio of 4.77 for IBG compared to modular stems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Diaz-Dilernia et al showed modular, distally fixed stems to be superior to impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique in treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures. 21 They found a significant association between surgical technique and complication rate with IBG having and odds ratio of 4.77 for IBG compared to modular stems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although bone grafting is recognized as an efficient, reliable, and promising orthopedic method, some studies have reported infectious complications associated with this procedure. In addition, bone grafting requires more operating time due to the determination of material, size, volume, and structure of graft appropriate to the defect (24)(25)(26). Conventionally, autologous bone is considered the optimal material since it is capable of meeting all necessary components including osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenesis of bone regeneration (27), and of avoiding histoincompatibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, modular mega-prostheses)[ 17 ]. Each of these methods has unique advantages and limitations[ 17 - 19 ]. Standard modular prostheses are an available option for proximal femoral reconstruction in many cases and have been developed to be broadly applicable across several patient groups and fracture morphologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%