2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact testing of structural biological materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictable delamination response in this study is in direct contrast to that found when bone is subject to lower velocity, and therefore lower-energy impacts. Lee et al (60) dropped a 1.2 kg weight from different heights on to various materials including bovine bone and a synthetic composite and found that the biological materials did not behave in a predictable fashion, with the same damage mechanisms occurring at different impact energies. Unfortunately, these authors analyze delamination in two dimensions only, ignoring depth; their study thus cannot be used to determine the relationship between impact force and the extent of delamination through the thickness of the laminate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictable delamination response in this study is in direct contrast to that found when bone is subject to lower velocity, and therefore lower-energy impacts. Lee et al (60) dropped a 1.2 kg weight from different heights on to various materials including bovine bone and a synthetic composite and found that the biological materials did not behave in a predictable fashion, with the same damage mechanisms occurring at different impact energies. Unfortunately, these authors analyze delamination in two dimensions only, ignoring depth; their study thus cannot be used to determine the relationship between impact force and the extent of delamination through the thickness of the laminate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is ample evidence that the mechanical properties of biological materials are sensitive to hydration, which tends to decrease hardness and modulus, but increase toughness (e. g. 3,22,35,60,71,[106][107][108][109]. It is convenient to define the sensitivity to hydration, S H , as the relative change in indentation hardness/modulus upon dehydration, S H,H I = (H I, d − H I, w )/H I, w and S H,E I = (E I, d − E I, w )/E I, w , where the indices w and d indicate data from hydrated ('wet') and dehydrated ('dry') materials, respectively.…”
Section: The Effect Of Hydration On Indentation Hardness and Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure and mechanical properties of the armadillo carapace have recently been investigated by several groups. [33][34][35] …”
Section: Armadillo Osteodermmentioning
confidence: 99%