2013
DOI: 10.1177/0954410013514743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact point model predictive control of a spin-stabilized projectile with instability protection

Abstract: Most smart projectile control systems generate lateral control forces to guide the round to a target. Experience has shown that under the right combination of body orientation, translational velocity, and angular velocity, relatively low lateral control force inputs can induce instability of the round. To solve this problem, an additional control logic layer is appended to a nominal impact point flight control law to protect it from instability in these infrequent, but consequential situations. To highlight th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking a time derivative of (26), the detector rate is given by, Two assumptions are invoked for model equivalency purposes. First, it is assumed that the airframe flies at low total angle of attack so that , where represents the error components from equation (19). This assumption will be supported in the next section with an observer designed to remove excess angular motion.…”
Section: Control System Gain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking a time derivative of (26), the detector rate is given by, Two assumptions are invoked for model equivalency purposes. First, it is assumed that the airframe flies at low total angle of attack so that , where represents the error components from equation (19). This assumption will be supported in the next section with an observer designed to remove excess angular motion.…”
Section: Control System Gain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study two motor-wing assemblies are considered to be packaged near the projectile base oriented 180 deg apart in roll angle. Since the focus of this study is on the imager-based guidance and control algorithm, additional details regarding this particular maneuver mechanism are omitted here for brevity but may be found in References [17][18][19][20]. …”
Section: A Projectile Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, two motor-wing assemblies are considered to be packaged near the projectile base oriented 180 deg apart in roll angle. Because the focus of this study is on the imager-based guidance and control algorithm, additional details regarding this particular maneuver mechanism are omitted here for brevity but may be found in [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: A Projectile Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated expansion and contraction of the nutation at specific states of the precession angle allows us to "walk the precession" and produce a nonzero average of the AOA throughout the precession cycle, which changes the bullet trajectory. Closed-loop trajectory maneuverability can be achieved with active nutation control through trajectory optimization and model predictive controls [10][11][12].…”
Section: B Precession Synchronized Single Actuator Performancementioning
confidence: 99%