1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.5.994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact-Parameter Representations in Potential Scattering

Abstract: Starting from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation the off-energy-shell generalizations of the Glauber amplitude and the Blankenbecler-Goldberger amplitude a r e derived for potential scattering. The Lippmann-Schwinger equation for partial waves treated a s a Fredholm equation i s solved and the high-energy limit studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set takes into account the off-the-energy-shell effects through the integration over the intermediate particle's momentum q α . A similar equation but for potential scattering was given by Kamal and Chavda [33]. At sufficiently high energies of the projectile, the interaction between the antiproton and the target proton cannot markedly change the incident velocity of the projectile.…”
Section: Transformation Into Impact-parameter Representationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This set takes into account the off-the-energy-shell effects through the integration over the intermediate particle's momentum q α . A similar equation but for potential scattering was given by Kamal and Chavda [33]. At sufficiently high energies of the projectile, the interaction between the antiproton and the target proton cannot markedly change the incident velocity of the projectile.…”
Section: Transformation Into Impact-parameter Representationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where the P l m are Pollaczek polynomials in the variable x simply related to the momentum κ and the ϕ ml (r) are Laguerre functions similar to ξ ml (r) of equation (33) except that the Lagerre polynomials in the definition are replaced by L 2l+1 m (r). The details of deriving (A.1) are given in [42].…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation