2009
DOI: 10.1108/17506140910963620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of work‐related values upon attitudes toward changes and organizational learning in Chinese organizations

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore understanding about impact of work-related values on attitudes toward changes and organizational learning in Chinese organizations. Design/methodology/approach -Research was conducted with 1,303 respondents from 29 Chinese companies in 2005-2006. The companies were from two areas: Peking and Jinan. The respondents filled out three questionnaires: a questionnaire about work-related values, a questionnaire about attitudes toward changes and a questionnaire about o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though organizations should use their ability to recognise and acquire new information, assimilate knowledge and then apply it to commercial ends (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990), the mechanism through which banks in this study recruit sources of training, the timing of the training sessions and the methods of selecting the participants (bankers) for those training opportunities come in disagreement with this theory and with what has been highlighted earlier by Mousa and Ayoubi (2019), who consider nepotism as a determinant factor in giving rewards and awards in the Egyptian public sector. This contradicts recommendations by Alas et al (2009), who urge transparent institutional procedures in addition to a kind of cultural equality for the effective functioning of organizational learning.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Even though organizations should use their ability to recognise and acquire new information, assimilate knowledge and then apply it to commercial ends (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990), the mechanism through which banks in this study recruit sources of training, the timing of the training sessions and the methods of selecting the participants (bankers) for those training opportunities come in disagreement with this theory and with what has been highlighted earlier by Mousa and Ayoubi (2019), who consider nepotism as a determinant factor in giving rewards and awards in the Egyptian public sector. This contradicts recommendations by Alas et al (2009), who urge transparent institutional procedures in addition to a kind of cultural equality for the effective functioning of organizational learning.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Managers are the key drivers of organisational change and their approaches to nurturing organisational learning through shared vision, personal mastery, mental models, team and system learning (DiBella, Nevis & Gould, 1996;Senge, 1990) are critical. Alas, Vadi and Sun (2009), Dumphy, Turner and Crawford (1997) and Gravin (1993) have treated organisational learning as outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, organizational learning has both structural and cultural elements (Alas et al, 2009;Slater and Narver, 1994). Therefore, the development of learning organizations requires both structural and cultural changes.…”
Section: Organizational Learning Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%