2005
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of wildfires on surface water repellency in soils of northwest Spain

Abstract: Abstract:Soil water repellency (hydrophobicity) is a naturally occurring phenomenon that can be intensified by soil heating during fires. Fire-induced water repellency, together with the loss of plant cover, is reportedly the principal source of increased surface runoff and accelerated erosion in burned soils.In this study, the surface water repellency of several soils affected by summer forest fires in northwest Spain was studied and compared with that of adjacent unburned soils. Soil water repellency was det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
2
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
7
39
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 compares the ethanol classes of the recently burned soils at the two sampling depths (0-2 and 2-5 cm) with those of the neighbouring unburned soils at the top 5 cm. These results were already analysed in detail in a prior work (Varela et al, 2005), and, in a nutshell, indicate that fire induces repellency in soils that are wettable, increases repellency severity in soils that are slightly to moderately repellent and leaves it basically unaltered in soil that are strongly or very strongly repellent. Soils 8, 19 and 23 are an exception to the latter in the sense that they suffer a decrease from (very) strong to moderate severity at the upper sampling depth however, these three soils exhibited strong to very strong water repellency in the 2-5 cm layer.…”
Section: Soil Aggregationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Figure 5 compares the ethanol classes of the recently burned soils at the two sampling depths (0-2 and 2-5 cm) with those of the neighbouring unburned soils at the top 5 cm. These results were already analysed in detail in a prior work (Varela et al, 2005), and, in a nutshell, indicate that fire induces repellency in soils that are wettable, increases repellency severity in soils that are slightly to moderately repellent and leaves it basically unaltered in soil that are strongly or very strongly repellent. Soils 8, 19 and 23 are an exception to the latter in the sense that they suffer a decrease from (very) strong to moderate severity at the upper sampling depth however, these three soils exhibited strong to very strong water repellency in the 2-5 cm layer.…”
Section: Soil Aggregationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It is assumed that the soil has resumed its normal properties and that any hydrophobic effects induced by the fire (e.g. Sidle et al, 1985;Varela et al, 2005) have disappeared. It is further assumed that potential evapotranspiration, as determined with the Blaney-Criddle equation calibrated by pan evaporation data, remains the same as with the current land use.…”
Section: Scenario Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alkyl chain length, alkyl chain saturation, ionized molecules). This may explain the inconsistent results on whether or not the amount of soil organic matter (SOM) has an influence on the occurrence or severity of WR (Aelamanesh et al, 2014;Eynard et al, 2006;Hajnos et al, 2013;Mataix-Solera et al, 2013;Mataix-Solera and Doerr, 2004;Mirbabaei et al, 2013;Varela et al, 2005;Vogelmann et al, 2013;Woche et al, 2005) and the findings of pronounced differences in the effects of a range of organic molecules on WR (de Blas et al, 2013;Doerr et al, 2000;Fischer et al, 2013;Simkovic et al, 2008). WR can be assessed by means of the water drop penetration time (WDPT) test (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%