2002
DOI: 10.1177/000841740206900503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Wheeled Seated Mobility Devices on Adult Users' and Their Caregivers' Occupational Performance: A Critical Literature Review

Abstract: The prescription of wheeled seated mobility devices for clients with mobility impairment is a growing area in occupational therapy practice. The goal is to enhance client participation in occupation through technical intervention. This critical review examines the body of knowledge concerning the impact and effectiveness of the provision of wheeled seated mobility on the occupational performance of wheelchair users and their caregivers. The scope and gaps in the literature are defined to identify areas for fut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each article was evaluated for quality based on eight criteria: 1) study purpose; 2) literature; 3) study design; 4) sampling; 5) data collection; 6) analyses; 7) rigour; and 8) conclusions / implications. The scale (Table 1) is detailed in its evaluation of the research quality and can be scored on a point system (each section receiving a score of 1 = the criterion was met; 0 = the criterion was not satisfied), with a maximum score of 18 [32,33]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each article was evaluated for quality based on eight criteria: 1) study purpose; 2) literature; 3) study design; 4) sampling; 5) data collection; 6) analyses; 7) rigour; and 8) conclusions / implications. The scale (Table 1) is detailed in its evaluation of the research quality and can be scored on a point system (each section receiving a score of 1 = the criterion was met; 0 = the criterion was not satisfied), with a maximum score of 18 [32,33]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13), while research on activities and participation and other outcomes of using powered wheelchairs is scarce. Moreover, the studies are mainly qualitative or pilot studies (7,14) and the majority of the body of research has methodological limitations (15).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Using a Powered Wheelchairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beneficial effects on daily activities are also well described, e.g., personal care and functional mobility, employability [20,21]; work performance, leisure participation [22], and parenting [23]. In contrast, socio-cultural implications are seldom a research focus [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%