1972
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1972.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Water Fluoridation on Dental Practice and Dental Manpower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a study of paired, naturally fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities found only small differences in therapy, both as to quantity and type (136,137). Although no attempt was made to explain the smaller than expected difference, one hypothesis is that dentists do what they are trained to do and what they get paid for doing, whether the need is present or not.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a study of paired, naturally fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities found only small differences in therapy, both as to quantity and type (136,137). Although no attempt was made to explain the smaller than expected difference, one hypothesis is that dentists do what they are trained to do and what they get paid for doing, whether the need is present or not.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studies have been concerned with children and it has been demonstrated that fluoridation lowers the per capita cost of their dental care by reducing both the amount and complexity of treatment. These savings in turn lead to a reduction in chairside time (1,4). Savings in the cost of treating 5-year-olds of 50-60% (1,9) and 13-16-year-olds of 35 % (3) have been estimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%