2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of water abstraction on storage and breakdown of coarse organic matter in mountain streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In deep water ecosystems, both temperature and dissolved oxygen content are usually low limiting litter decomposition as an effect of reduced microbial activity (Torremorell and Gantes, 2010;Fonseca et al, 2013). Though many direct measurements of macrophyte decomposition rates in response to increase water depth have shown positive effects on decomposition process and nutrient release efficiency, also neutral or even negative results were reported (Cai et al, 2006;Wright et al, 2013;Arroita et al, 2015). The inconsistent effects of water depth on litter decomposition may be caused by differences in litter quality, since litter tissues (including roots, leaves, twigs and stems) used in the above-mentioned experiments differed in quality and type (Trinder et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deep water ecosystems, both temperature and dissolved oxygen content are usually low limiting litter decomposition as an effect of reduced microbial activity (Torremorell and Gantes, 2010;Fonseca et al, 2013). Though many direct measurements of macrophyte decomposition rates in response to increase water depth have shown positive effects on decomposition process and nutrient release efficiency, also neutral or even negative results were reported (Cai et al, 2006;Wright et al, 2013;Arroita et al, 2015). The inconsistent effects of water depth on litter decomposition may be caused by differences in litter quality, since litter tissues (including roots, leaves, twigs and stems) used in the above-mentioned experiments differed in quality and type (Trinder et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, and contrasting with our hypotheses, abstraction did not affect organic matter breakdown in the wetted channel. This result parallels previous studies (Dewson et al ., ; Arroita et al ., ), suggesting little impact on the detrital pathway as long as leaf litter remains wet. However, large portions of the streambed dried out due to the contraction of the wetted perimeter, and, as a consequence, organic matter too, including some of our bags.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Contrary to other studies that reported water abstraction to increase water temperature and pH (Rader & Belish, ; McIntosh, Benbow & Burky, ) and decrease dissolved oxygen concentration (James et al ., ), our experiment did not affect water physicochemical variables, as was also reported in a previous study in the region (Arroita et al ., ). The lack of response probably reflects the strong shade and moderate nutrient concentrations in the stream we studied, the small size of the diversion weir, the fast renewal of the water retained, and the short distance between both reaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Arroita et al . ). Some of these impacts may still occur downstream of the point where water is returned to the stream (eg reduced sediment transport caused by the diversion structure and altered water temperatures).…”
Section: Small Hydropower Impacts On Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functionmentioning
confidence: 97%