2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-011-9360-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Volume Viscosity on the Structure of Turbulent Premixed Flames in the Thin Reaction Zone Regime

Abstract: Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of turbulent premixed flames burning hydrogen, synthetic gas and methane have been performed, relying on detailed chemical and transport models and taking into account volume viscosity. In this manner, it becomes possible to quantify the impact of this last contribution. It is shown that laminar flames are not modified by volume viscosity, while the local structure of turbulent flames may differ considerably when taking it into account. A noticeable impact is even observed on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk-viscosity coefficient, which accounts for the relaxation time needed to equilibrate translational and internal energies in the gas volume, is neglected in this study. However, under some conditions this coefficient can be, at least, of the same order of magnitude as the molecular viscosity (Cramer 2013), and its effects may become important in dilatational flows (Fru, Janiga & Thévenin 2012). In this work, these effects may be hindered since the fuel stream is highly diluted, and hydrogen is the species that exhibits the largest bulk-viscosity coefficient in the mixture.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The bulk-viscosity coefficient, which accounts for the relaxation time needed to equilibrate translational and internal energies in the gas volume, is neglected in this study. However, under some conditions this coefficient can be, at least, of the same order of magnitude as the molecular viscosity (Cramer 2013), and its effects may become important in dilatational flows (Fru, Janiga & Thévenin 2012). In this work, these effects may be hindered since the fuel stream is highly diluted, and hydrogen is the species that exhibits the largest bulk-viscosity coefficient in the mixture.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While monoatomic gases show no evidence of bulk viscosity effects, experimentally measured values of the bulk-to-shear viscosity ratio (κ/η) vary widely for most of the diatomic gases used nowadays in both academic and practical experimental and numerical combustion studies [12,14,15]. In [15], it is stated that the volume viscosity is at least of the same order of magnitude as the shear viscosity (η) at 300 K, with a ratio κ/η for hydrogen as high as 52 at a temperature of 1000 K. Our recent findings for turbulent premixed flames burning hydrogen-containing fuels show a nonnegligible influence of the volume viscosity term on the turbulent flame structure, even for average quantities [16]. On the other hand, first DNS computations for flames burning methane show a minor impact of volume viscosity for all considered cases for global flame properties such as the volume-integrated heat release rate and turbulent burning velocity [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The single input data subroutine EGSKm(), suitable for fine-grain-distributed architectures with large number of processors, has been used. The integer m attached to the subroutine name refers to the various methods/models used in evaluating κ [15,16]. It varies between 2 and 6.…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of bulk viscosity effects has been previously analyzed in several situations including shock-hydrogen bubble interactions [3], turbulent flames [8], compressible boundary layers [9], shock-boundary layer interaction [10], and planar shockwave [11]. All these studies confirm that the bulk viscosity effects may be significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%