Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to assess the computer monitors used for analysis and interpretation of digital radiographs within the clinics of the Oral Health Centre of Western Australia. Materials and Methods In total, 135 computer monitors (3 brands, 6 models) were assessed by analysing the same radiographic image of a combined 13-step aluminium step wedge and the Artinis CDDent 1.0® (Artinis Medical Systems B.V.®, Elst, the Netherlands) test object. The number of steps and cylindrical objects observed on each monitor was recorded along with the monitor's make, model, position relative to the researcher's eye level, and proximity to the nearest window. The number of window panels blocked by blinds, the outside weather conditions, and the number of ceiling lights over the surgical suite/cubicle were also recorded. MedCalc® version 19.2.1 (MedCalc Software Ltd®, Ostend, Belgium, https://www.medcalc.org ; 2020) was used for statistical analyses (Kruskal-Wallis test and stepwise regression analysis). The level of significance was set at P <0.05. Results Stepwise regression analysis showed that only the monitor brand and proximity of the monitor to a window had a significant impact on the monitor's performance ( P <0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences ( P <0.05) in monitor performance for all variables investigated, except for the weather and the clinic in which the monitors were placed. Conclusion The vast performance variation present between computer monitors implies the need for a review of monitor selection, calibration, and viewing conditions.

Interpretation time efficiency with radiographs: a comparison study between standard 6 and 12 MP high-resolution display monitors

“…This could reflect that the radiologists had a higher diagnostic confidence with the higher quality images on the 12 MP monitors or could possibly reflect that the images displayed on the 12 MP monitors required less windowing/leveling to make the diagnosis. Prior studies have demonstrated that larger and higher definition monitors can increase observer performance and perceived image quality for various types of tasks; [14][15][16][17][18] however, other studies did not show a significant difference. 11,19 The average decrease in TAT was <7s for each of the evaluated study types.…”