2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2017.8019297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of video resolution changes on QoE for adaptive video streaming

Abstract: HTTP adaptive streaming (HAS) has become the de-facto standard for video streaming to ensure continuous multimedia service delivery under irregularly changing network conditions. Many studies already investigated the detrimental impact of various playback characteristics on the Quality of Experience of end users, such as initial loading, stalling or quality variations. However, dedicated studies tackling the impact of resolution adaptation are still missing. This paper presents the results of an immersive audi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As per prior subjective studies, the QoE of video streaming is a function of application layer QoS features that are either dependent on the video content (e.g., video bitrate) or the playout metrics (e.g., the intial startup delay) [7], [27]; the playout metrics further depend on the underlying network conditions such as the network throughput or delay. In this work, we consider building QoE functions that take as input the network throughput or the video bitrate, and differ to a future work the consideration of other factors that might also impact the QoE, though to a lesser importance, such as the delay and the loss rate.…”
Section: From Qos To Qoementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per prior subjective studies, the QoE of video streaming is a function of application layer QoS features that are either dependent on the video content (e.g., video bitrate) or the playout metrics (e.g., the intial startup delay) [7], [27]; the playout metrics further depend on the underlying network conditions such as the network throughput or delay. In this work, we consider building QoE functions that take as input the network throughput or the video bitrate, and differ to a future work the consideration of other factors that might also impact the QoE, though to a lesser importance, such as the delay and the loss rate.…”
Section: From Qos To Qoementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per prior subjective studies, the QoE of video streaming is a function of application layer QoS features that are either dependent on the video content (e.g., video bit rate) or the playout metrics (e.g., the intial startup delay) [8], [18]; the playout metrics further depend on the underlying network conditions such as the network throughput or delay.…”
Section: From Qos To Qoementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compare the different implementations in terms of main application-level QoS factors (e.g., stalls, resolution switches and interruptions) that could impact the subjective QoE [8], [18]. We focus on the quality switches as they occur only in adaptive video streaming sessions making their evaluation important.…”
Section: A Simulating Qoe-driven Dashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the academic domain, researchers are now more inclined to use QoE to evaluate adaptive strategies by optimizing the HAS algorithms based on the different QoE models. Most of the related studies on improving the QoE of HAS are client-driven approaches, they obey the client-centric nature of HAS [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Some researches have also focused on the server or network side [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the client-driven approaches, the research [ 11 ] presented the results of the impact of resolution changes on user-perceived QoE in HAS and further demonstrated that the content type and resolution change patterns have significant impacts on the perception of resolution changes. The findings may help develop better QoE models and adaptation mechanisms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%