2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of various air mass types on cloud condensation nuclei concentrations along coastal southeast Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations at 0.4% S were only 9.6%, 8.9%, and 12% higher for the three cases indicating a less soluble aerosol than for the M case. Higher CCN concentrations for cases with more biomass burning aerosol is consistent with results of CCN measurements made at Virginia Key, an island east of Miami, FL (Edwards et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Concentrations at 0.4% S were only 9.6%, 8.9%, and 12% higher for the three cases indicating a less soluble aerosol than for the M case. Higher CCN concentrations for cases with more biomass burning aerosol is consistent with results of CCN measurements made at Virginia Key, an island east of Miami, FL (Edwards et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…PM 2.5 increased from ∼5 to 25-30 μg m −3 upon the arrival of smoke to New York City from wildfires over Alberta, Canada, with enhancements in OC, EC, and K + (Wu et al, 2018). Edwards et al (2021) showed a twofold increase in PM 2.5 when comparing BB days (9.54 μg m −3 ) to background days (4.26 μg m −3 ) in coastal southeast Florida. In contrast with the previous studies, Sapkota et al (2005) reported much higher PM 2.5 enhancements over Baltimore (8-fold increase relative to background) during the arrival of BB plumes from Quebec forest fires in July 2002, with the 24 h PM 2.5 concentration reaching as high as 86 μg m −3 .…”
Section: Surface Air Qualitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies have found that dust can commonly act as a cloud condensation nucleus even from the source, as it often has hygroscopic material, and thus can influence cloud formation (Twohy et al, 2009). In contrast to these findings, Denjean et al (2015) saw that African dust transported from Africa to the Caribbean Basin remained mainly externally mixed and that dust particles did not take up significant amounts of water when exposed to up to 94 % relative humidity, a similar finding to that of Edwards et al (2021) from African dust transported to Florida. The larger, super-micron dust particles act as giant CCN that can form large cloud droplets that lead to the earlier formation of raindrops (Rosenfeld et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%