2011
DOI: 10.3354/ame01489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of UVA radiation on algae and bacteria in Baltic Sea ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the light saturation index (Ek), which did not tend to decrease downwards (Müller et al in press), albeit the 5.3-7.5-cm snow cover at our collecting sites was sufficient to attenuate 80% of the incident radiation (Müller et al in press). The Ek values in our samples were also higher than those in previous Baltic Sea measurements (Enberg et al 2015;Piiparinen and Kuosa 2011;Piiparinen et al 2010;Rintala et al 2010). Nevertheless, all the Baltic Ek values measured are more comparable to values under thin-ice conditions than to values under low-light conditions (Ban et al 2006;Obata and Taguchi 2009;Robinson et al 1998), and Baltic Sea bottom-ice algae are not as shade-adapted as the bottom-ice algae in polar regions (Alou-Font et al 2013;Arrigo et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by the light saturation index (Ek), which did not tend to decrease downwards (Müller et al in press), albeit the 5.3-7.5-cm snow cover at our collecting sites was sufficient to attenuate 80% of the incident radiation (Müller et al in press). The Ek values in our samples were also higher than those in previous Baltic Sea measurements (Enberg et al 2015;Piiparinen and Kuosa 2011;Piiparinen et al 2010;Rintala et al 2010). Nevertheless, all the Baltic Ek values measured are more comparable to values under thin-ice conditions than to values under low-light conditions (Ban et al 2006;Obata and Taguchi 2009;Robinson et al 1998), and Baltic Sea bottom-ice algae are not as shade-adapted as the bottom-ice algae in polar regions (Alou-Font et al 2013;Arrigo et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Usually, the predominant autotrophic eukaryotes are diatoms (Haecky et al 1998;Meiners et al 2002;Norrman and Andersson 1994), but in contrast to Arctic sea ice, the dinoflagellate and green algal biomass is considerable in Baltic Sea ice (Kaartokallio et al 2007;Piiparinen et al 2010;Rintala et al 2010). Another peculiarity of Baltic Sea ice is that the surfacelayer algal biomass may significantly contribute to the overall algal biomass (Meiners et al 2002;Piiparinen and Kuosa 2011;Piiparinen et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not discuss the effect of under-saturation on their results. Studies done on Baltic Sea ice that have used 1 (Mock et al 1997) to 2 orders of magnitude higher Leu saturating concentrations (Kaartokallio 2004, Piiparinen & Kuosa 2011 do not report problems attributable to undersaturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, bacteria decompose particulate organic matter and remineralize nutrients (Sullivan and Palmisano, 1984;Deming, 2010). Sea-ice bacteria and their community structure are governed by abiotic and biotic factors such as temperature, salinity, light, substrate and nutrient availability, as well as grazing and viral lysis (Kaartokallio, 2004;Mock and Thomas, 2005;Kuosa and Kaartokallio, 2006;Riedel et al, 2007;Collins et al, 2008Collins et al, , 2010Piiparinen and Kuosa, 2011;Collins, 2015). As the fluctuation of these factors is highly seasonal, they also induce the seasonal dynamics of bacterial abundance and community composition in sea ice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%