2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954411917699237
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Using Conventional Inlet/Outlet Boundary Conditions on Haemodynamic Metrics in a Subject-Specific Rabbit Aorta

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics is a tool capable of accurately measuring metrics currently used to predict the behaviour of cardiovascular diseases. This study quantifies the impact various commonly used inlet and outlet boundary conditions have on various shear rate-based haemodynamic metrics currently used for predicting the localisation of cardiovascular diseases. Simulations are conducted on an accurately represented rabbit aorta configuration and comparison has been made against available in vivo data. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This comparison highlights the importance of using a physiologically accurate BC when investigating haemodynamics within the aorta. Similar findings were found by McElroy and Keshmiri (2018) when studying the flow in an accurately represented rabbit aorta.…”
Section: Effects Of Using Conventional Zero-pressure Boundary Conditionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This comparison highlights the importance of using a physiologically accurate BC when investigating haemodynamics within the aorta. Similar findings were found by McElroy and Keshmiri (2018) when studying the flow in an accurately represented rabbit aorta.…”
Section: Effects Of Using Conventional Zero-pressure Boundary Conditionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The localization of various lesions including atherosclerosis and thrombosis has been extensively studied and have shown to be related to different local haemodynamic metrics including some of the work of the present authors (Deyranlou et al 2020;Kabinejadian et al 2016;Keshmiri et al 2016;McElroy et al 2016a;McElroy and Keshmiri 2018;Ruiz-Soler et al 2017;Swanson et al 2020). These haemodynamic parameters can be directly derived from the flow velocity fields obtained by CFD-based simulation tools.…”
Section: Haemodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is one of the best solutions for this matter. In recent years, CFD has successfully been applied to numerous biomedical-related projects involving design, validation and proof-of-concept; some examples from the present authors include ( Deyranlou et al, 2020 ; McElroy and Keshmiri, 2018 ; Ruiz-Soler et al, 2017 ; Swanson et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of patient information, Murray's Law or the splitting method, both established from the power law relationship between branch diameter and flow rate, could be used ( 39 , 40 ). Several authors have favored Murray's law over the zero-pressure boundary condition, for capturing more physiologically relevant flow features ( 33 , 39 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies ignore the pulsatile nature of blood flow, assuming instead a steady-state condition (25,26). This assumption is computationally-efficient when only considering the mean WSS result, but pulsatility is crucial for capturing time-dependent parameters such as instantaneous velocities and WSS, timeaveraged wall shear stress (TAWSS), transverse WSS (transWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT) (33). In addition to the above assumptions, the computational result is highly sensitive to the assigned boundary conditions (BCs) (32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%