2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Using Audit Data to Improve the Evidence-Based Use of Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible initiative to do so was studied in British Columbia, following a study that showed that SFRT was provincially underused [16]. Data from this study were then presented to radiation oncologists across the province at meetings and conferences, and the rates of SFRT prescriptions were measured following this intervention [39,40]. In fact, the authors found an increase in SFRT prescriptions by at least 10% [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible initiative to do so was studied in British Columbia, following a study that showed that SFRT was provincially underused [16]. Data from this study were then presented to radiation oncologists across the province at meetings and conferences, and the rates of SFRT prescriptions were measured following this intervention [39,40]. In fact, the authors found an increase in SFRT prescriptions by at least 10% [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a recent SEER analysis reported a difference of $3094 (95% CI: $2107‐4081) between single fraction and 10 or longer fractionation schemes . There are estimates that an absolute increase of 10% use of single fraction palliative radiation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer could generate over $70 million per year in health cost savings …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 There are estimates that an absolute increase of 10% use of single fraction palliative radiation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer could generate over $70 million per year in health cost savings. 2,31,32 There are several limitations to this study, many of which are inherent to the NCDB and a retrospective analysis. The lack of clinical details regarding the specifics of each bone metastases is a major limitation.…”
Section: Short Course Long Course P-valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 These data, combined with audit data of prescribing practices and a knowledge translation strategy, led to increased use of single fraction radiotherapy across all six British Columbia cancer centers, saving money, increasing quality of life, and reducing wait times. 13,14 Not all provinces have mandated implementation of PRO measures and not all Canadian radiation oncology programs have the experience with PROs to know how best to use the information collected. As the majority of PRO work has been center-specific, there is an important need to look nationally at how best to improve alignment among these local level activities.…”
Section: Examples Of Pro Initiatives In Canadian Radiotherapy Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%