Abstract:Purpose of review-Cognitive disorders remain a major global burden with an estimated 47 million people living with dementia worldwide. Rates of cognitive disorders are expected to grow, especially as the global population ages. Global trends also indicate that about half of the global population lives in urban settings. To help guide future research, as well as the development of targeted and tailored interventions to prevent and care for people living with cognitive disorders, we present an up-to-date review … Show more
“…Our study is consistent with review articles that found that people living in urban centers tended to develop dementia less than those in rural areas [7,30]. Although there was an unequal distribution or a lack of resources related to better cognitive function (health clinics, bookstores, and libraries) due to the de cit of educated consumer demand or taxes for such resources in lower education communities [26], this may more easily happen in non-urban areas than in urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A systematic review with a meta-analysis concluded that early life rural living was strongly associated with a risk of Alzheimer's disease [30]. In addition, previous studies have mentioned that rural areas had educational inequality, such as more insu cient educational opportunities and less quality of education [7,31]. Although some children left rural areas and proceeded to higher grade schools in urban areas [31], many participants in the current study may live in the same rural areas where they received education for a long time [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another review identi ed that living in urban areas was likely to reduce cognitive decline risk when compared to those in rural areas [7]. On the other hand, a recent US study showed that the prevalence of dementia declined more signi cantly among adults living in rural areas than those in urban areas over the past few decades as a result of improving educational attainment [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, it was not common to adjust for confounding factors such as residential years [6,9]. Fourth, exploring the relationship between community-level educational attainment and dementia among urban and rural older adults was insu cient [7,8]. Overcoming the limitations of the aforementioned studies, this longitudinal study with large sample size data aimed to examine whether older populations living in communities with a higher proportion of lower educational attainment have the risk of dementia incidence when compared to those living in communities with a lower proportion of less education after controlling for individual-level educational years.…”
Background:Understanding of the association between community-level socioeconomic status and dementia is insufficient. We examined the contextual effect of community-level prevalence of lower educational attainment on the risk of dementia incidence. This work further explored the potential differences in associations for urban and non-urban areas. Methods:We analyzed a six-year prospective cohort data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide survey between 2010 and 2012 of 49,888 (23,339 men and 26,549 women) physically and cognitively independent individuals aged ≥65 years from 346 communities at 16 municipalities in seven prefectures. Dementia incidence was assessed through the public long-term care insurance system by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan. Educational years were dichotomized as ≤9 years and ≥10 years. We classified urban and non-urban areas using a Functional Urban Area defined by the European Union (EU) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We performed a two-level (community- and individual-level) multilevel survival analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results:The cumulative incidence of dementia during the follow-up period was 10.3%. The mean proportion of educational attainment with ≤9 years was 41.1% (range, 4.7%–88.4%). Higher prevalence of community-level lower educational attainment had a significant association with a higher risk of dementia incidence (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06, estimated by 10 percentage points of lower educational attainment) post adjusting for individual-level educational years, age, sex, income, residential years, disease, alcohol, smoking, social isolation, and population density. The association was significant in non-urban areas (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00–1.10). Conclusions:Older people living in communities with a higher prevalence of less educational attainment among their age demographic tended to develop dementia more often than those living in areas with a lower prevalence of less educational attainment after adjusting for individual-level educational attainment and covariates. In particular, the association was more pronounced in non-urban areas than in urban areas. Securing education for adolescence as a life course and population approach could thus be crucial to prevent dementia later in life among all older people living in non-urban areas.
“…Our study is consistent with review articles that found that people living in urban centers tended to develop dementia less than those in rural areas [7,30]. Although there was an unequal distribution or a lack of resources related to better cognitive function (health clinics, bookstores, and libraries) due to the de cit of educated consumer demand or taxes for such resources in lower education communities [26], this may more easily happen in non-urban areas than in urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A systematic review with a meta-analysis concluded that early life rural living was strongly associated with a risk of Alzheimer's disease [30]. In addition, previous studies have mentioned that rural areas had educational inequality, such as more insu cient educational opportunities and less quality of education [7,31]. Although some children left rural areas and proceeded to higher grade schools in urban areas [31], many participants in the current study may live in the same rural areas where they received education for a long time [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another review identi ed that living in urban areas was likely to reduce cognitive decline risk when compared to those in rural areas [7]. On the other hand, a recent US study showed that the prevalence of dementia declined more signi cantly among adults living in rural areas than those in urban areas over the past few decades as a result of improving educational attainment [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, it was not common to adjust for confounding factors such as residential years [6,9]. Fourth, exploring the relationship between community-level educational attainment and dementia among urban and rural older adults was insu cient [7,8]. Overcoming the limitations of the aforementioned studies, this longitudinal study with large sample size data aimed to examine whether older populations living in communities with a higher proportion of lower educational attainment have the risk of dementia incidence when compared to those living in communities with a lower proportion of less education after controlling for individual-level educational years.…”
Background:Understanding of the association between community-level socioeconomic status and dementia is insufficient. We examined the contextual effect of community-level prevalence of lower educational attainment on the risk of dementia incidence. This work further explored the potential differences in associations for urban and non-urban areas. Methods:We analyzed a six-year prospective cohort data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide survey between 2010 and 2012 of 49,888 (23,339 men and 26,549 women) physically and cognitively independent individuals aged ≥65 years from 346 communities at 16 municipalities in seven prefectures. Dementia incidence was assessed through the public long-term care insurance system by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan. Educational years were dichotomized as ≤9 years and ≥10 years. We classified urban and non-urban areas using a Functional Urban Area defined by the European Union (EU) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We performed a two-level (community- and individual-level) multilevel survival analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results:The cumulative incidence of dementia during the follow-up period was 10.3%. The mean proportion of educational attainment with ≤9 years was 41.1% (range, 4.7%–88.4%). Higher prevalence of community-level lower educational attainment had a significant association with a higher risk of dementia incidence (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00–1.06, estimated by 10 percentage points of lower educational attainment) post adjusting for individual-level educational years, age, sex, income, residential years, disease, alcohol, smoking, social isolation, and population density. The association was significant in non-urban areas (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00–1.10). Conclusions:Older people living in communities with a higher prevalence of less educational attainment among their age demographic tended to develop dementia more often than those living in areas with a lower prevalence of less educational attainment after adjusting for individual-level educational attainment and covariates. In particular, the association was more pronounced in non-urban areas than in urban areas. Securing education for adolescence as a life course and population approach could thus be crucial to prevent dementia later in life among all older people living in non-urban areas.
“…Previous studies have shown that environmental factors such as urbanization and traffic (e.g., highway construction) have been associated with cognitive function in older age [9][10][11][12]. For example, living in cities appears to reduce the risk of cognitive impairment, although the exact reasons are unclear [12,13].…”
Individual and meteorological factors are associated with cognitive function in older adults. However, how these two factors interact with each other to affect cognitive function in older adults is still unclear. We used mixed effects models to assess the association of individual and meteorological factors with cognitive function among older adults. Individual data in this study were from the database of China Family Panel Studies. A total of 3448 older adults from 25 provinces were included in our analysis. Cognitive functions were measured using a memory test and a logical sequence test. We used the meteorological data in the daily climate dataset of China’s surface international exchange stations, and two meteorological factors (i.e., average temperature and relative humidity) were assessed. The empty model showed significant differences in the cognitive scores of the older adults across different provinces. The results showed a main impact of residence (i.e., urban or rural) and a significant humidity–residence interaction on memory performance in older adults. Specifically, the negative association between humidity and memory performance was more pronounced in urban areas. This study suggested that meteorological factors may, in concert with individual factors, be associated with differences in memory function in older adults.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.