Impact of Urban Neighborhood Disadvantage on Late Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Virginia

Abstract

Research suggests that residents of inner-city urban neighborhoods have higher rates of late stage cancer diagnosis. Identifying urban neighborhoods with high rates of both concentrated disadvantage and late stage cancer diagnosis may assist health care providers to target screening interventions to reduce disparities. The purposes of this study were to (1) create an index to evaluate concentrated disadvantage (CD) using non-racial measures of poverty, (2) determine the impact of neighborhood CD on late stage breast cancer diagnosis in US cities, and (3) to understand the role of obesity on this relationship. We used census block group- (CBG) level poverty indicators from five Virginia cities to develop the index. Breast cancer cases of women aged 18-65 who lived in the five cities were identified from the 2000-2012 Virginia Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model with random intercept was used to evaluate the impact of disadvantage on late stage breast cancer diagnosis. CBG-level maps were developed to geographically identify neighborhoods with both high rates of CD and late breast cancer staging. Over 900 CBGs and 6000 breast cases were included. Global fit of the concentrated disadvantage model was acceptable. The effect of disadvantage on late stage was significant (OR = 1.0083, p = 0.032). Inner-city poverty impacts risk of late stage breast cancer diagnosis. Area-level obesity is highly correlated with neighborhood poverty (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.0001) but the mediating direct and indirect effects are non-significant. Intervening in these high poverty neighborhoods may help combat disparities in late stage diagnosis for urban poor and for minorities living in these underserved neighborhoods, but more study is needed to understanding the complex relationship between concentrated neighborhood poverty, obesity, and late stage diagnosis.

Neighborhood Social Determinants of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

“…The construct operationalizes urban theory regarding the overconcentration of Blacks, children and female-headed families in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods (29). This measure of disadvantage has been associated with poor outcomes in breast and ovarian cancer (30, 31). We derived CDI using 2008–2012 5-year estimates of American Community Survey (ACS), to best align with the study period 3 .…”

The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials

“…Generally, rates of cancer screening for migrants to Australia are slightly lower than the Australian born population [14][15][16]. There is also some evidence of a socioeconomic gradient in screening [17][18][19], and while this is not conclusive [20], studies have identified patterns of more advanced disease at diagnosis among diverse cultural or lower socioeconomic groups [21][22][23]. It is therefore important to target strategies to improve uptake of screening among these at-risk groups.…”

Developing a Priority Scoring Index for Mobile Mammography Sites: Considerations for Screening Access in Rural and Remote Settings

“…The spatial accessibility index for components [b] to [d] was constructed based on an enhanced 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility 7,8 using straight-line distances and population centroids calculated at the census tract level. The 2SFCA method has advantages over other traditional methods in measuring spatial accessibility.…”