2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3663860
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of unbalanced charge transport on the efficiency of normal and inverted solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All observed systems with FF > 65% have a mobility ratio >0.1 meaning that the hole and electron mobilities are balanced within one order of magnitude. This trend agrees well with simulations and is expected to become even more pronounced as film thickness increases . Establishing balanced mobilities by itself however is not sufficient for achieving high FF as is clearly illustrated by the many data points with balanced mobilities but low FF .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…All observed systems with FF > 65% have a mobility ratio >0.1 meaning that the hole and electron mobilities are balanced within one order of magnitude. This trend agrees well with simulations and is expected to become even more pronounced as film thickness increases . Establishing balanced mobilities by itself however is not sufficient for achieving high FF as is clearly illustrated by the many data points with balanced mobilities but low FF .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The PCE vs µ h or µ e display mostly scattered plots; however, a strong positive correlation was deciphered for the PCE vs µ e /µ h ranging from 10 −3 to 10 -1 (Figure 6c). This highlights the superiority of mobility balance in the devices performance, in good accordance with the simulation reported by Blom et al 64 and experiments of our previous mono-adduct fullerenes. 47 On the other hand, we need to mention that the low-performing bis-adducts of SPCBM (PCE max = 1.59%), SCBA (PCE max = 1.62%), and CCBA (PCE max = 0.38%) are far below the general line.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[164] In inverted device geometries, the two electrodes are essentially reversed, and electrons flow from the back electrode to the transparent electrode, which allows the use of as olution-processed back electrode. [164] In inverted device geometries, the two electrodes are essentially reversed, and electrons flow from the back electrode to the transparent electrode, which allows the use of as olution-processed back electrode.…”
Section: Invertedstructured Opvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPVs with an inverted structure have shown promise for higher lifetimes than those with an ormals tructure mainly because someo ft he mechanisms responsible for the degradation of OPVs do not exist if the cell structure is inverted. [164] In inverted device geometries, the two electrodes are essentially reversed, and electrons flow from the back electrode to the transparent electrode, which allows the use of as olution-processed back electrode. [94] Figure12s hows ac omparison between typical normal and inverted device structures.…”
Section: Invertedstructured Opvsmentioning
confidence: 99%