2021
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i11.2433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of type 2 diabetes on adenoma detection in screening colonoscopies performed in disparate populations

Abstract: BACKGROUND The Black/African Ancestry (AA) population has a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a higher incidence and mortality rate for colorectal cancer (CRC) than all other races in the United States. T2DM has been shown to increase adenoma risk in predominantly white/European ancestry (EA) populations, but the effect of T2DM on adenoma risk in Black/AA individuals is less clear. We hypothesize that T2DM has a significant effect on adenoma risk in a predominantly Black/AA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical metadata were manually collected on each patient using electronic medical records (EMRs) at the two hospitals. Datapoints recorded included: age at the time of pathologic diagnosis of CRC; sex (Male, Female); race (White/EA, Black/AA, Asian, Other); Hispanic ethnicity; insurance (Commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, Self-pay); body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2); tobacco exposure (current within one year, past use greater than one year, never); Family history of first degree relative with CRC; History of screening colonoscopy prior to diagnosis (Age < 50 y, Age > 80 y, yes, no); Interval CRC defined as diagnosis sometime after a normal screening colonoscopy (yes, diagnosis made within recommended interval for repeat surveillance or screening colonoscopy; no; unknown); Anatomic location of CRC (right or transverse colon to cecum, left or splenic flexure to sigmoid colon, rectum); CRC stage at diagnosis (0-4); and Surgical resection (yes, no), as previously described [5,7]. Patients were phenotyped as diabetic if this diagnosis was in the EMR or if a recent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was ≥ 6.5% [8].…”
Section: Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical metadata were manually collected on each patient using electronic medical records (EMRs) at the two hospitals. Datapoints recorded included: age at the time of pathologic diagnosis of CRC; sex (Male, Female); race (White/EA, Black/AA, Asian, Other); Hispanic ethnicity; insurance (Commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, Self-pay); body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2); tobacco exposure (current within one year, past use greater than one year, never); Family history of first degree relative with CRC; History of screening colonoscopy prior to diagnosis (Age < 50 y, Age > 80 y, yes, no); Interval CRC defined as diagnosis sometime after a normal screening colonoscopy (yes, diagnosis made within recommended interval for repeat surveillance or screening colonoscopy; no; unknown); Anatomic location of CRC (right or transverse colon to cecum, left or splenic flexure to sigmoid colon, rectum); CRC stage at diagnosis (0-4); and Surgical resection (yes, no), as previously described [5,7]. Patients were phenotyped as diabetic if this diagnosis was in the EMR or if a recent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was ≥ 6.5% [8].…”
Section: Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial chart review of procedures performed in 2012 revealed low average adenoma detection rates in screening colonoscopies performed by some operators at one institution [ 7 ]. After intense physician feedback, the average adenoma detection rates increased to above national levels at both institutions by 2017 [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation