2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of turbulence models and roughness height in 3D steady RANS simulations of wind flow in an urban environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inlet wind conditions were simulated using Equations –(3) (Delgado‐Fernandez et al, 2018; Hesp et al, 2015; Richards & Hoxey, 1993) normalU()zgoodbreak=normalu*κln()z+normalz0z0 normalk()zgoodbreak=normalu*2Cμ normalε()zgoodbreak=normalu*3normalκ()normalzgoodbreak+z0 where U (z), k (z) and ε (z) are wind speed, turbulence kinetic energy and turbulence dissipation rate at elevation z , respectively; u * is wind shear velocity (m s −1 ); z 0 is aerodynamic roughness length at the ocean surface (0.0002 m) (WMO, 2018); κ is the von Karman's constant (0.4187); C μ is a model constant (0.09) (Richards & Hoxey, 1993). The aerodynamic roughness length was selected as 0.05 m and 0.24 m for an area covered by sand and marram grass, respectively (Wakes et al, 2010), and 0.0013 m for John Wilson Drive (road surface) (Ricci et al, 2020). U * = 0.6 m s −1 (which gives incident wind speed U C = 15.2 m s −1 ; Figure 4a) and incident wind approach angle WA C = 40° (Figure 4b) is used in this study.…”
Section: Methodology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inlet wind conditions were simulated using Equations –(3) (Delgado‐Fernandez et al, 2018; Hesp et al, 2015; Richards & Hoxey, 1993) normalU()zgoodbreak=normalu*κln()z+normalz0z0 normalk()zgoodbreak=normalu*2Cμ normalε()zgoodbreak=normalu*3normalκ()normalzgoodbreak+z0 where U (z), k (z) and ε (z) are wind speed, turbulence kinetic energy and turbulence dissipation rate at elevation z , respectively; u * is wind shear velocity (m s −1 ); z 0 is aerodynamic roughness length at the ocean surface (0.0002 m) (WMO, 2018); κ is the von Karman's constant (0.4187); C μ is a model constant (0.09) (Richards & Hoxey, 1993). The aerodynamic roughness length was selected as 0.05 m and 0.24 m for an area covered by sand and marram grass, respectively (Wakes et al, 2010), and 0.0013 m for John Wilson Drive (road surface) (Ricci et al, 2020). U * = 0.6 m s −1 (which gives incident wind speed U C = 15.2 m s −1 ; Figure 4a) and incident wind approach angle WA C = 40° (Figure 4b) is used in this study.…”
Section: Methodology and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…road surface)(Ricci et al, 2020). U* = 0.6 m s À1 (which gives incident wind speed U C = 15.2 m s À1 ; Figure4a) and incident wind approach angle WA C = 40 (Figure4b) is used in this study.CFD-simulated winds were validated with field observation in experiment 1 at all wind mast locations (Figure4c-e).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models are widely used in the simulation of urban and indoor air movement. [30][31][32][33][34] In the preliminary computation, three RANS models, namely, standard k-e model, RNG k-e model and realisable k-e model were adopted and the results were compared. The calculation results using three turbulence models are not much different, but the standard k-e model can achieve convergence faster than the other two models.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the RANS simulation has shown acceptable predication accuracy in wind-driven singlesided natural ventilation 15 and there are also some similar studies in urban wind flow simulation. [24][25][26][27][28] Further, Blocken et al 29 stated that the RANS simulation can provide sufficient accuracy in modelling airflows in a built environment. Considering that this study only focuses on mean wind flow (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%