2002
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Treatment on the Quality of Life in Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia

Abstract: our results suggest that changes in dimensions of QOL obtained by limb revascularisation do not differ from those of other therapeutic approaches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19][20][21] No significant differences between the two trial arms emerged across a range of generic and disease-specific HRQOL measures. 22 Although patients had a very low HRQOL before treatment, BSX and BAP both had very similar effects on short-term gains in HRQOL that were sustained for at least 3 years after randomization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21] No significant differences between the two trial arms emerged across a range of generic and disease-specific HRQOL measures. 22 Although patients had a very low HRQOL before treatment, BSX and BAP both had very similar effects on short-term gains in HRQOL that were sustained for at least 3 years after randomization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In light of its high sensitivity and specificity, 16,17 correlation with disease severity, 18 ability to predict future cardiovascular events, 19 ease of performance, and low cost, the ABI has long been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of PAD. Although not specifically validated as a screening tool in patients undergoing nontraumatic amputation, given the cost, morbidity, and decrement in quality of life associated with lower extremity amputation, [20][21][22] the threshold for measurement of the ABI should be low. For these reasons, The optimal amount of preamputation arterial testing has yet to be defined based on test characteristics, outcomes studies, and cost-effectiveness studies.…”
Section: What the Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] We used the NBS method for the SF-36. The norm-based transformation of the scores to general population means allows comparison of the physical and mental components of the health of patients with similar and other underlying conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%