2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4415-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of tissue-based genomic profiling on clinical decision making in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer at academic centers

Abstract: Tumor genomic profiling affected clinical management in a minority of patients with metastatic breast cancer, thus these data do not support the routine use of genomic profiling outside of a clinical trial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 More recently, genomic profiling of 117 patients with metastatic BC demonstrated a relatively high frequency of PIK3CA mutations in the entire cohort (32%). 13 In another series of 132 tumors that were tested by NGS, nine carried PIK3CA mutations and two yielded partial response to PIK3CA inhibition. 14 Although PIK3CA protein expression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in early BC, 15 PIK3CA mutations have been associated with favorable prognostic significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 More recently, genomic profiling of 117 patients with metastatic BC demonstrated a relatively high frequency of PIK3CA mutations in the entire cohort (32%). 13 In another series of 132 tumors that were tested by NGS, nine carried PIK3CA mutations and two yielded partial response to PIK3CA inhibition. 14 Although PIK3CA protein expression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in early BC, 15 PIK3CA mutations have been associated with favorable prognostic significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although actionable alterations were found in >95% of breast cancer patients, the percentage of patients who received therapy driven by these genomic profiling results varied, with one study showing 9% and the other showing 52%. 70,71 As in other solid tumors, cell-free or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive option for testing and management. Advantages of assaying ctDNA include a relatively noninvasive, blood drawebased method of testing, which facilitates longitudinal assessment, as well as the potential for capturing a heterogeneous landscape of a whole tumor.…”
Section: Multigene or Comprehensive Sequencing Panelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the technological advances, little data supports the routine use of large-scale genomic testing of tumors in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first clinical trials have been disappointing, as in spite of the presence of targetable mutations in a majority of enrolled patients, only 11% had actually been treated according to their molecular tumor profile [19]. However, for selected mutations, evidence from clinical trials supports the use of genomic profiling.…”
Section: Molecular Profiling Of Advanced Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%