2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.07.029587
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Tiny Targets on Glossina fuscipes quanzensis, the primary vector of Human African Trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Abstract: BackgroundOver the past 20 years there has been a >95% reduction in the number of Gambian Human African trypanosomiasis (g-HAT) cases reported globally, largely as a result of large-scale active screening and treatment programmes. There are however still foci where the disease persists, particularly in parts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Additional control efforts such as tsetse control using Tiny Targets may therefore be required to achieve g-HAT elimination goals. The purpose of this study w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attempted to measure fly density reduction by placing traps during 48 hours before each Tiny Targets deployment. Not surprisingly, considering the tsetse catch rate in general [27], the catch of tsetse in the small territory of the study sites was too low (total catch = 6 tsetse) to permit statistical analysis as a result the impact of targets on tsetse population is not considered in this paper.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attempted to measure fly density reduction by placing traps during 48 hours before each Tiny Targets deployment. Not surprisingly, considering the tsetse catch rate in general [27], the catch of tsetse in the small territory of the study sites was too low (total catch = 6 tsetse) to permit statistical analysis as a result the impact of targets on tsetse population is not considered in this paper.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and third deployment were faster to operate as there were fewer Tiny Targets to deploy and committee members had acquired skills and felt more confident (Fig 7). However, when comparing the output to a similar activity operated by the expert-led vector control team the same deployment would have been taken only 3 days [27].…”
Section: "A Woman Told Me the Peanuts Harvest Was Bad This Year Becaumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vector control is included in Eq (1) as f T (t), the probability of a fly both hitting a tiny target and subsequently dying at time t. The value of f T (t) is dependent on the population reduction achieved by any vector control performed. For Yasa Bonga health zone, the only health zone in which vector control took place prior to the end of the data collection period, a 90% reduction in tsetse population in the first year after biannual deployment of tiny targets was introduced [27]; more details are given in the SI (S1 Materials and Methods) about the functional form of f T (t), which was originally presented elsewhere [13]. Other tsetse parameters include the pupal stage P V from which new, unfed (teneral) adult flies emerge and it is on this pupal class where we place our density-dependent carrying capacity K, which governs the bounceback speed of the population in the case where f T (t) = 0.…”
Section: Model Ghat Infection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Large-scale vector control (VC): twice-yearly deployment of tiny targets to control the population of tsetse, with an assumed 80% reduction after one year, consistent with the lower bound efficacy estimates of field studies [4][5][6]20]. This intervention is assumed to span the areas with ongoing transmission in the previous five years, in keeping with existing operations.…”
Section: Settings and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%