2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Three Radiographic Methods in the Outcome of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment: A Five-Year Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Fernández et al . ) but also falls within the expected range for retrospective studies (Straus et al . ), so that the total number of teeth evaluated was sufficient to validate the results statistically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Fernández et al . ) but also falls within the expected range for retrospective studies (Straus et al . ), so that the total number of teeth evaluated was sufficient to validate the results statistically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…, Fernández et al . ). Additionally, taking into account that there are fundamental differences in prognosis between initially infected roots with inflamed periapices and roots without such lesions (Friedman , Ørstavik et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fernández et al . (), using PR and CBCT, retrospectively assessed the outcome of root canal treatment carried out on teeth with vital pulps 5 years previously. Of 17 prognostic factors assessed, four factors appeared to have a negative impact on the outcome of treatment when assessed with CBCT.…”
Section: Assessment Of Periapical Periodontitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In teeth with existing pre-operative periapical radiolucencies, reconstructed CBCT images also showed more failure (13.9%) when compared with PRs (10.4%). In a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, Fernández et al 81 evaluated the outcome of endodontic treatments as assessed by conventional and digital PRs and CBCT during a 5-year follow-up period. They suggested that CBCT was more sensitive than PRs for the visualization of periapical lesions in a long-term evaluation.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Outcome Of Root Canal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%