2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective

Abstract: Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well studied, their impact on the animals' welfare has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, our study aimed to compare three commonly used blood sampling techniques regarding their effects on different indicators… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Sorge et al [ 65 ] is mechanistically different to the other studies within this group, since exposure to a painful insult was applied, with differences in grimace response shown to result from a form of male pheromone-induced stress analgesia. The remaining two studies found increased grimace scores as a result of blood sampling [ 52 ] and handling and identification [ 64 ]. In the former [ 52 ], facial vein and retrobulbar bleeding increased scores in the immediate post-procedural period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study by Sorge et al [ 65 ] is mechanistically different to the other studies within this group, since exposure to a painful insult was applied, with differences in grimace response shown to result from a form of male pheromone-induced stress analgesia. The remaining two studies found increased grimace scores as a result of blood sampling [ 52 ] and handling and identification [ 64 ]. In the former [ 52 ], facial vein and retrobulbar bleeding increased scores in the immediate post-procedural period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining two studies found increased grimace scores as a result of blood sampling [ 52 ] and handling and identification [ 64 ]. In the former [ 52 ], facial vein and retrobulbar bleeding increased scores in the immediate post-procedural period. This study also provides further evidence for the effects of isoflurane on the MGS with increased scores seen in anaesthetised compared to sham handled groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the stress caused by the administration itself might have nonsignificantly elevated the GCM levels in the Saline group as well. For example, in mice a saline injection and different blood sampling procedures have been found to increase GCM levels (Meyer et al, 2020; Touma et al, 2004). The second factor might be individual differences in sensitivity of the HPA axis, documented in laboratory mice and rats (Gentsch et al, 1982; Veenema et al, 2004, 2005), which might have affected the resulting GCM levels in ACTH group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the experiment, the animals were fasted overnight, and blood samples were collected from the retrobulbar venous plexus using a heparin-pre-soaked capillary glass tube for various estimations. The rats were anesthetized during blood collection ( Meyer et al, 2020 ). Subsequently, the rats were sacrificed by injecting with sodium pentothal (Cristália, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) ( Zatroch, Knight, Reimer, & Pang, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%