2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00236-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of threat relevance on P3 event-related potentials in combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
52
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the oddball tests both higher (Kimble et al 2000) and lower (Stanford et al 2001) amplitudes of P300 wave were observed after target stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the oddball tests both higher (Kimble et al 2000) and lower (Stanford et al 2001) amplitudes of P300 wave were observed after target stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…People suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) had higher amplitudes of N1 (Attias et al 1996) and P300 waves after exposure to stimuli related to traumatic experiences (Attias et al 1996, Stanford et al 2001, Wessa et al 2006. During the oddball tests both higher (Kimble et al 2000) and lower (Stanford et al 2001) amplitudes of P300 wave were observed after target stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, P3o (or occipital P3, since it showed maximal amplitudes in this scalp region) has been also reported in CDTD tasks, such as visual search tasks (Luck 2012), and must be distinguished from the well-known centro-parietal P3 or P3b, and from fronto-central P3, also termed P3a or novelty P3. While the effects of emotionally negative non-target stimuli on P3a and P3b have been previously explored (Delplanque et al 2005;Feng et al 2012;Kim et al, 2013;Stanford et al 2001), data about P3o are very scarce, as well as proposals on its functional meaning. Moreover, it has not been described in previous studies employing emotional CDTD tasks.…”
Section: P3omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies on PTSD report abnormalities in P300, thus providing evidence for impaired cognitive processing in this disorder Blomhoff, Reinvang, & Malt, 1998;Charles et al, 1995;Felmingham et al, 2002;Kimble et al, 2000;Kounios et al, 1997;McFarlane, Weber, & Clark, 1993;Metzger et al, 1997ab;Neylan et al, 2003;Noldy & Carlen, 1997;Stanford et al, 2001). Studies finding attenuated P300 and delayed N200 attributed their results to concentration impairment (McFarlane, Weber, & Clark, 1993) or attention deficits (Charles et al, 1995;Metzger et al, 1997ab).…”
Section: P300 Abnormalities In Cocaine Addiction Methamphetamine Addmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased P300 amplitude in PTSD was explained as due to altered selective attention or heightened orienting to threatening or traumaspecific stimuli (Kimble et al, 2000). Several studies emphasized that P3a enhancement in PTSD is expressed when distracters are either trauma-related or novel stimuli in oddball tasks (Bleich, Attias, & Furnam, 1996;Felmingham et al, 2002;Kimble et al, 2000;Stanford et al, 2001;Neylan et al, 2003;Weinstein, 1995). In general, increased P300 amplitude in PTSD is thought to reflect attentional bias towards threat stimuli and reduced P300 amplitude is thought to reflect a consequent reduction in attentional resources to process non-threatening stimuli.…”
Section: P300 Abnormalities In Cocaine Addiction Methamphetamine Addmentioning
confidence: 99%