2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the pre-collection phase at different intensities of source segregation of bio-waste: An Italian case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different activities involved in the management of urban waste, the collection is one of the most relevant, both for the cost and for the potential impacts on the quality of the urban context (Di Maria et al, 2016). This activity requires care in the administration of the best alternatives from the environmental point of view as well as in terms of work safety, since the employees involved with it are subject to physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic and accident risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different activities involved in the management of urban waste, the collection is one of the most relevant, both for the cost and for the potential impacts on the quality of the urban context (Di Maria et al, 2016). This activity requires care in the administration of the best alternatives from the environmental point of view as well as in terms of work safety, since the employees involved with it are subject to physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic and accident risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source-segregation is considered as a solution in a nonlandfill waste management system, but plenty of environmental, economic and social factors, together with changing governance and political systems have an impact on the final effect. Source-segregation of waste may be intractable within high density urban communities [6,7]. Among municipal solid wastes (MSW) collected globally, only 15% is recycled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the UK increased diversion from 11% in 2000-2001to 43.2% in 2011-2012(DEFRA, 2012, however, the rate of progress has reduced year on year since 2005 and from 2012 to 2013 the diversion rate only increased by 0.3% (DEFRA, 2013). Often source-segregation is advocated as a 'key to the success' in non-landfill waste management systems (Yang et al, 2016), but, success is determined by the complex interplay of environmental, economic, and social factors (Di Maria et al, 2016;Tavares et al, 2009;Rispo et al, 2015;Bulkeley & Gregson, 2009) interacting within changing governance and political systems (Bulkeley et al, 2005). Interestingly, Rispo et al, (2015) has suggested that that source-segregation may be particularly challenging within hard to reach high density urban communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%