2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the policy of expanding benefit coverage for cancer patients on catastrophic health expenditure across different income groups in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
53
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic approach is needed in order to assess the effect of coverage decisions on different strata of the population [42]. Such a systematic process to work through the many trade-offs of efficiency with equity, financial protection, burden of disease, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic approach is needed in order to assess the effect of coverage decisions on different strata of the population [42]. Such a systematic process to work through the many trade-offs of efficiency with equity, financial protection, burden of disease, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study conducted in the rural area in Shandong Province, the incidence was about 31.43%, lower than the incidence we estimated in our study. The research led by Sujin also indicated that people living in less developed regions were more likely to suffer CHE compared with those in developed regions 23. Therefore, expanding health and welfare policy is necessary, which will enable poor people receive more financial supports, so that low‐income households with cancer patients can get protections against CHE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 Similar partial success was achieved in Mongolia with social health insurance coverage, 26 in South Korea with National Health Insurance (NHI) benefit coverage for cancer patients, 26 in Nigeria with NHIS. 14 Similar observations were done by other researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%