2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-020-03139-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the molecular weight on the size of chitosan nanoparticles: characterization and its solid-state application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though nanoparticle size is inversely related to the chitosan concentration used in their fabrication, a situation where more free NH + 3 groups are available to react with TPP and having a chitosan concentration beyond 0.3% w/v are reported to increase the nanoparticle size [49,59,60]. Our findings were contradictory to this, where with the use of 0.4% w/v chitosan concentration, a slight decrease in the nanoparticle size (Student's t-test, p = 0.260) was observed which can be attributed to the chitosan of low molecular weight used in the nanoparticle fabrication [61] (Table 1). Similarly, drug loading is also expected to further increase nanoparticles size, being an additional formulation moiety which is either adsorbed at the surface or entrapped in the nanoparticle core, and hence the particle size of the drug loaded nanoparticles was found to be significantly increased (Student's t-test, p = 0.015) compared to blank nanoparticles [49,62,63] as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Though nanoparticle size is inversely related to the chitosan concentration used in their fabrication, a situation where more free NH + 3 groups are available to react with TPP and having a chitosan concentration beyond 0.3% w/v are reported to increase the nanoparticle size [49,59,60]. Our findings were contradictory to this, where with the use of 0.4% w/v chitosan concentration, a slight decrease in the nanoparticle size (Student's t-test, p = 0.260) was observed which can be attributed to the chitosan of low molecular weight used in the nanoparticle fabrication [61] (Table 1). Similarly, drug loading is also expected to further increase nanoparticles size, being an additional formulation moiety which is either adsorbed at the surface or entrapped in the nanoparticle core, and hence the particle size of the drug loaded nanoparticles was found to be significantly increased (Student's t-test, p = 0.015) compared to blank nanoparticles [49,62,63] as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Even though CHS has a semi crystalline structure, this behavior reduces because of the breaking of hydrogen bonds when it is crosslinked with STPP (Fan, Yi, Zhang, & Yokoyama, 2017). These results correspond well with the XRD patterns reported by Villegas-Peralta et al (Villegas-Peralta et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ftir-atr Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lowest zeta potential value was obtained for HCHS-NPs, which due to agglomerates. In a similar study, Villegas-Peralta et al (Villegas-Peralta et al, 2020) reported that when molecular weight in CHS increases, a reduction in the zeta potential was observed.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Diameter and Zeta Potential Measurementmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The TPP will create strong binding flex with the amine molecules of chitosan to stabilize the matrix. In addition, TPP is less toxic compared to any other chemical crosslinker, such as glutaraldehyde [28,35,36]. In this study, we aimed to formulate the nanochitosan by using the medium molecular weight chitosan under an acidic environment.…”
Section: E2f1 Mrna Expression Analysis After Ch-np-antimir-106b-5p Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular weight may affect the transfection ability and medium weight has notable advantages to induce better bioavailability since it carries more amines and hydroxyl molecules inside. The acidity of the dissolving solution also enhances the protonation among the amine molecules [36,37].…”
Section: E2f1 Mrna Expression Analysis After Ch-np-antimir-106b-5p Trmentioning
confidence: 99%