2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the introduction of a universal childhood influenza vaccination programme on influenza-related admissions to paediatric intensive care units in England

Abstract: IntroductionA universal childhood influenza vaccination programme was introduced in the UK in September 2013. We examine the impact of the gradual introduction of this programme on influenza-related paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission rates in England.MethodsWe extracted data on all influenza-related admissions to PICUs in England in resident children aged 0–15 years old between October 2003 and March 2017 from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database. We estimated influenza-a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non‐significant reductions were noted amongst primary school aged children for primary care consultations and swab positivity, secondary care swab positivity, laboratory confirmed hospitalisations and ED attendances. As shown previously and in other studies, it continues to be evident that the impact and greater effect sizes are in primary care indicators in comparison to those in secondary care, in both targeted and non‐targeted populations 26–29 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non‐significant reductions were noted amongst primary school aged children for primary care consultations and swab positivity, secondary care swab positivity, laboratory confirmed hospitalisations and ED attendances. As shown previously and in other studies, it continues to be evident that the impact and greater effect sizes are in primary care indicators in comparison to those in secondary care, in both targeted and non‐targeted populations 26–29 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As shown previously and in other studies, it continues to be evident that the impact and greater effect sizes are in primary care indicators in comparison to those in secondary care, in both targeted and non-targeted populations. [26][27][28][29] Findings from historical trends for GP ILI consultations, hospitalisations and ICU/admissions suggest significant differences post-programme introduction in GP ILI consultations in all age groups; however, these differences should be interpreted with caution due to pre-existing differences between the pilot and non-pilot areas prior to the programme. Nonetheless, as seen previously, reductions remain evident in targeted populations and there continues to be evidence that an indirect effect on the <5 year olds is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar study using PICAnet data looking at PICU admissions related to influenza between October 2003 and March 2017 showed an average of 64 PICU admissions per year. Assuming an average of 16,000 PICU admissions per year this would account for approximately 4 per 1000 PICU admissions [23]. Similar data for UK PICU admissions related to RSV are not available, however, one study has investigated all cause bronchiolitis admissions to UK PICUs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%