2022
DOI: 10.1177/09691413221128666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening in New York City

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the delivery of cancer screening. The resulting decrease in outpatient visits and cancellations of non-urgent procedures have negatively affected colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to determine the effect of the pandemic on CRC screening at a safety-net hospital and a private health system based in New York City. Methods We identified individuals eligible for CRC screening aged 50 to 75 years presenting for outpatient care at a safety-net public … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as in our study, in the recently published Dutch study, the delays associated with the pandemic have not modified the probability of detection of CRC and, only minimally, the detection of advanced neoplasia in colonoscopy. Our results are comparable to those published by the Dutch group and contradict those of other studies with smaller sample sizes where differences were determined in the participation, adherence to the screening test, and changes in the probability of detecting CRC [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, as in our study, in the recently published Dutch study, the delays associated with the pandemic have not modified the probability of detection of CRC and, only minimally, the detection of advanced neoplasia in colonoscopy. Our results are comparable to those published by the Dutch group and contradict those of other studies with smaller sample sizes where differences were determined in the participation, adherence to the screening test, and changes in the probability of detecting CRC [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Consistent with previously-reported disparities evident during the COVID-19 pandemic [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the gender of the head and neck population significantly differed between cohorts with females comprising 42% of the population in 2019 and only 24% in 2020 (p = 0.036). This disparity is evident in other databases that demonstrate a decrease in the proportion of female patients presenting to medical centers during the pandemic vs. pre-pandemic [35][36][37]. It is possible the gender disparity demonstrated in this study is a downstream effect of the disproportionate burden placed on women during the pandemic including existing gender inequalities in the workforce, labor market segregation, and childcare responsibilities [32][33][34][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Our results are comparable to those published by the Dutch group and contradict those of other studies with smaller sample sizes where differences were determined in participation, adherence to the screening test, and changes in the probability of detecting CRC. [12,13] We have detected a result that deserves a comment. Long delays between the positive FIT and colonoscopy were significantly associated with a reduced risk of CRC detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%