In response to increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 , highend general circulation models (GCMs) simulate an accumulation of energy at the top of the atmosphere not through a reduction in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR)-as one might expect from greenhouse gas forcing-but through an enhancement of net absorbed solar radiation (ASR). A simple linear radiative feedback framework is used to explain this counterintuitive behavior. It is found that the timescale over which OLR returns to its initial value after a CO 2 perturbation depends sensitively on the magnitude of shortwave (SW) feedbacks. If SW feedbacks are sufficiently positive, OLR recovers within merely several decades, and any subsequent global energy accumulation is because of enhanced ASR only. In the GCM mean, this OLR recovery timescale is only 20 y because of robust SW water vapor and surface albedo feedbacks. However, a large spread in the net SW feedback across models (because of clouds) produces a range of OLR responses; in those few models with a weak SW feedback, OLR takes centuries to recover, and energy accumulation is dominated by reduced OLR. Observational constraints of radiative feedbacks-from satellite radiation and surface temperature data-suggest an OLR recovery timescale of decades or less, consistent with the majority of GCMs. Altogether, these results suggest that, although greenhouse gas forcing predominantly acts to reduce OLR, the resulting global warming is likely caused by enhanced ASR.global warming | climate feedbacks | energy accumulation G lobal conservation of energy is a powerful constraint for understanding Earth's climate and its changes. Variations in atmospheric composition that result in a net positive energy imbalance at the top of atmosphere (TOA) drive global warming, with the world ocean as the primary reservoir for energy accumulation (1). In turn, increasing global surface temperature enhances emission of longwave (LW) radiation to space (the Planck response). A schematic of the global energy budget response to a step change in greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations is illustrated in Fig. 1A: outgoing LW radiation (OLR) initially decreases because of enhanced LW absorption by higher GHG levels; as energy accumulates in the climate system, global temperature rises and OLR increases until the TOA energy balance is restored-when OLR once again balances the net absorbed solar radiation (ASR). In this canonical view of global warming, the net energy accumulation (shaded green area in Fig. 1A) is a consequence of decreased OLR driven by GHG forcing. In contrast, consider a hypothetical step change in solar insolation (Fig. 1B): ASR is increased, and energy accumulates until the climate warms sufficiently that OLR balances the ASR perturbation. In this case, the net energy accumulation (shaded red area in Fig. 1) is a consequence of increased ASR and opposed by the increased OLR (hatched green area in Fig. 1).Is the present global warming caused by reduced OLR (as in Fig. 1A) or enhanced ASR (as in Fig. 1B)? Ant...